Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China

被引:4
|
作者
Zeng, Xiaowen [1 ]
Jin, Ming [2 ]
Pan, Shuang [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Fac Econ, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; urban innovation; mediating effect; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192416993
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impacts of Heterogenous Environmental Regulations on Green Innovation of New Energy Firms: Empirical Evidence from China
    Feng, Mei
    Chen, Yiqing
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (06): : 5029 - 5046
  • [42] How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China
    Yu Hao
    Yerui Wu
    Haitao Wu
    Siyu Ren
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 7835 - 7850
  • [43] How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China
    Hao, Yu
    Wu, Yerui
    Wu, Haitao
    Ren, Siyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (08) : 7835 - 7850
  • [44] Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China
    Gao, Weiyan
    Wang, Yuzhang
    Wang, Fengrong
    Mbanyele, William
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 94 : 133 - 149
  • [45] Urban innovation, heterogeneous environmental regulations and haze reduction effects-evidence from pilot policies of innovative cities
    Xu, Yue
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [46] Can Environmental Regulations Promote Corporate Environmental Responsibility? Evidence from the Moderated Mediating Effect Model and an Empirical Study in China
    Peng, Benhong
    Tu, Yu
    Wei, Guo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [47] Do Occupational Regulations Increase Earnings? Evidence from China
    Chi, Wei
    Kleiner, Morris M.
    Qian, Xiaoye
    INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2017, 56 (02): : 351 - 381
  • [48] Can new urbanization pilot policies promote green technology innovation in cities: Empirical evidence from China
    Cheng, Jing
    Chen, Jiarui
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [49] Do anticipated government environmental audits promote corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Tan, Jianhua
    Chan, Kam C.
    Niu, Runkai
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (05) : 3884 - 3901
  • [50] Do rising housing prices restrict urban innovation vitality? Evidence from 288 cities in China
    Yu, Liangliang
    Cai, Yinying
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 72 : 276 - 288