Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China

被引:4
|
作者
Zeng, Xiaowen [1 ]
Jin, Ming [2 ]
Pan, Shuang [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Fac Econ, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; urban innovation; mediating effect; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192416993
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do environmental regulations hamper small enterprises' market entry? Evidence from China
    Li, Guangqin
    Lu, Shiyu
    Shao, Shuai
    Yang, Lili
    Zhang, Ke
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (01) : 252 - 266
  • [22] Do fintech applications promote regional innovation efficiency? Empirical evidence from China
    Yang, Lihong
    Wang, Shixun
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 83
  • [23] Do Government-Based Customers Promote Green Innovation? Evidence from China
    Gong, Guangming
    Yang, Ni
    Yang, Ming
    Xiao, Liang
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (09) : 2081 - 2095
  • [24] Do smart cities promote a green economy? Evidence from a quasi-experiment of 253 cities in China
    Liu, Kui
    Meng, Chuyan
    Tan, Jing
    Zhang, Guanglu
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 99
  • [25] INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL INSTRUMENTS ON GREEN INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM 285 CITIES OF CHINA
    Cai, Wugan
    Ye, Peiyun
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 20 (08): : 1213 - 1223
  • [26] Local environmental spending spillover effects on green innovation: evidence from cities in China
    Liu, Min
    Liu, Weijiang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023,
  • [27] EXPLORING THE ROLE OF INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: EVIDENCE FROM GBA CITIES IN CHINA
    Chen, Xiaoheng
    Ma, Muhan
    Gant, Rui
    Zhang, Xing
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (09): : 9378 - 9389
  • [28] Do Technology Transfer Networks Impact Urban Innovation Capacity? Evidence From Chinese Cities
    Fan, Fei
    Wen, Zilin
    Shao, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Hong
    Yang, Bihong
    INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2025, 48 (03) : 306 - 333
  • [29] Heterogeneous effects of environmental regulations on green technology innovation: measurement by using patents and evidence from China's prefecture-level cities
    Zhang, Na
    Bi, Yanran
    Gao, Wenyue
    Deng, Jia
    Tang, Erzi
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2024, 129 (12) : 7667 - 7698
  • [30] What can the environmental rule of law do for environmental innovation? Evidence from environmental tribunals in China
    Zhou, Kuo
    Luo, Haotian
    Qu, Zhi
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 189