Do SEII Electrons Really Degrade SEM Image Quality?

被引:8
|
作者
Bernstein, Gary H. [1 ]
Carter, Andrew D. [2 ]
Joy, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Nano Sci & Technol, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
scanning electron microscopy; backscattered electrons; secondary electrons; electron beam lithography; Monte Carlo simulations; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1002/sca.21027
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Generally, in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, it is desirable that a high-resolution image be composed mainly of those secondary electrons (SEs) generated by the primary electron beam, denoted SEI. However, in conventional SEM imaging, other, often unwanted, signal components consisting of backscattered electrons (BSEs), and their associated SEs, denoted SEII, are present; these signal components contribute a random background signal that degrades contrast, and therefore signal-to-noise ratio and resolution. Ideally, the highest resolution SEM image would consist only of the SEI component. In SEMs that use conventional pinhole lenses and their associated EverhartThornley detectors, the image is composed of several components, including SEI, SEII, and some BSE, depending on the geometry of the detector. Modern snorkel lens systems eliminate the BSEs, but not the SEIIs. We present a microfabricated diaphragm for minimizing the unwanted SEII signal components. We present evidence of improved imaging using a microlithographically generated pattern of Au, about 500 nm thick, that blocks most of the undesired signal components, leaving an image composed mostly of SEIs. We refer to this structure as a spatial backscatter diaphragm. SCANNING 35:1-6, 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How do we really know that we are improving quality?
    Kaluzny, AD
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (11): : 719 - 720
  • [32] Do we really have to consider covariance matrices for image features?
    Kanazawa, Y
    Kanatani, K
    EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 301 - 306
  • [33] Dose related decreased image quality of CT doesn't degrade the diagnostic quality of PET-CT
    Talbott, Sabrina
    Bhatt, Geetika
    Li, Xiao-Feng
    Civelek, A. Cahid
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [34] Study of Chemical Staining on Metallization for SEM Image Quality Effect Improvement
    Fong, Chan Sieng
    Seng, Ng Hong
    ICSE: 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 410 - 413
  • [35] Image quality enhancement of a CD-SEM image using conditional generative adversarial networks
    Midoh, Yoshihiro
    Nakamae, Koji
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXXIII, 2019, 10959
  • [36] IMPROVEMENT OF STEM IMAGE QUALITY BY MEANS OF NORMALIZATION WITH INCIDENT ELECTRONS
    SUZUKI, T
    HATSUKAWA, K
    HANAI, T
    HIBINO, M
    MARUSE, S
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, 1990, 39 (04): : 324 - 324
  • [37] Introduction to the topic:: Quality management and quality assurance.: Do they really help to improve quality in ophthalmology?
    Händel, A
    Heinz, P
    Kruse, FE
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2004, 101 (10): : 971 - 972
  • [38] Imaging Quality and Dosage in ENT - What Do We Really Need?
    Bitterwolf, L.
    Luenzner, K.
    Heinrichs, J.
    Diogo, I.
    Wiegand, S.
    Teymoortash, A.
    Gueldner, C.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2013, 92 (05) : 332 - 337
  • [39] Do employees' feelings really matter in service-quality management?
    Slatten, Terje
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2010, 22 (03) : 318 - 338
  • [40] Shaping performance: do international accreditations and quality management really help?
    Nigsch, Stefano
    Schenker-Wicki, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 35 (06) : 668 - 681