Do SEII Electrons Really Degrade SEM Image Quality?

被引:8
|
作者
Bernstein, Gary H. [1 ]
Carter, Andrew D. [2 ]
Joy, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Nano Sci & Technol, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
scanning electron microscopy; backscattered electrons; secondary electrons; electron beam lithography; Monte Carlo simulations; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1002/sca.21027
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Generally, in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, it is desirable that a high-resolution image be composed mainly of those secondary electrons (SEs) generated by the primary electron beam, denoted SEI. However, in conventional SEM imaging, other, often unwanted, signal components consisting of backscattered electrons (BSEs), and their associated SEs, denoted SEII, are present; these signal components contribute a random background signal that degrades contrast, and therefore signal-to-noise ratio and resolution. Ideally, the highest resolution SEM image would consist only of the SEI component. In SEMs that use conventional pinhole lenses and their associated EverhartThornley detectors, the image is composed of several components, including SEI, SEII, and some BSE, depending on the geometry of the detector. Modern snorkel lens systems eliminate the BSEs, but not the SEIIs. We present a microfabricated diaphragm for minimizing the unwanted SEII signal components. We present evidence of improved imaging using a microlithographically generated pattern of Au, about 500 nm thick, that blocks most of the undesired signal components, leaving an image composed mostly of SEIs. We refer to this structure as a spatial backscatter diaphragm. SCANNING 35:1-6, 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do flushed biodegradable wet wipes really degrade?
    Allison, Thomas
    Ward, Benjamin D.
    Harbottle, Michael
    Durance, Isabelle
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 894
  • [2] Managing Image Quality and Patient Dose in the Angiography Suite: Do You Really Need That Image Quality?
    Dixon, Robert G.
    Wagner, Louis
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 13 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [3] What do users really perceive -: probing the subjective image quality
    Nyman, Goete
    Radun, Jenni
    Leisti, Tuomas
    Oja, Joni
    Ojanen, Harri
    Olives, Jean-Luc
    Vuori, Tero
    Hakkinen, Jukka
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE III, 2006, 6059
  • [4] RESOLUTION AND QUALITY OF IMAGE IN SEM
    KATAYAMA, Y
    SOEZIMA, H
    MASAKI, T
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, 1973, 22 (03): : 285 - 285
  • [5] Optimizing Dose in the Interventional Suite: Do You Really Need That Image Quality?
    Dixon, R. G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3869 - 3869
  • [6] Quality Measures: Do They Really Measure Quality?
    Elston, Dirk M.
    CUTIS, 2010, 86 (01): : 8 - 10
  • [7] Image quality: it really does matter
    Edwards, Paul C.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 116 (05): : 525 - 527
  • [8] The influence of environment temperature on SEM image quality
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Junshan
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (07)
  • [9] SEM Image Analysis for Quality Control of Nanoparticles
    Alexander, S. K.
    Azencott, R.
    Bodmann, B. C.
    Bouamrani, A.
    Chiappini, C.
    Ferrari, M.
    Liu, X.
    Tasciotti, E.
    COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF IMAGES AND PATTERNS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5702 : 590 - +
  • [10] DO TUNNELING ELECTRONS PROBE THE IMAGE INTERACTION
    NGUYEN, HQ
    FEUCHTWANG, TE
    CUTLER, PH
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1986, 47 (C-2): : 37 - 44