Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
|
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy Outcomes Between Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Mid-term Results
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Tao
    Cai, Bin
    Xu, Jianguang
    Lian, Xiaofeng
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (06): : E252 - E257
  • [32] Single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus dynamic cervical implant: clinical and radiological outcome
    Omar El Farouk Ahmed
    Ahmed Galal
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 56
  • [33] Single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus dynamic cervical implant: clinical and radiological outcome
    Ahmed, Omar El Farouk
    Galal, Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 56 (01):
  • [34] The Impact of Menopause on Bone Fusion after the Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Park, Sung Bae
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Lee, Sang Hyung
    Yang, Hee-Jin
    Son, Young-Je
    Chung, Young Seob
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 54 (06) : 496 - 500
  • [35] Predictive Factors of Postoperative Dysphagia in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Saville, Philip
    McAnany, Steven
    Patel, Dil
    Haws, Brittany
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Singh, Kern
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (07) : E400 - E407
  • [36] Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
    Tan, Wei
    Zhou, Chusong
    Guo, Dongying
    Sun, Jin
    Cao, Wei
    Yang, Liu-Zhu
    Wu, Mingxin
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (01) : E23 - E34
  • [37] Clinical presentation and outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical disc disease
    Srikhande, Ninad N.
    Kumar, V. A. Kiran
    Kiran, N. A. Sai
    Ghosh, Amrita
    Pal, Ranabir
    Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Luis
    Kumar, V. Anil
    Reddy, Vishnu Vardhan
    Agrawal, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2019, 10 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [38] Cervical sagittal balance parameters after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Correlations with clinical and functional outcomes
    Siasios, Ioannis
    Winograd, Evan
    Khan, Asham
    Vakharia, Kunal
    Dimopoulos, Vassilios G.
    Pollina, John
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2018, 9 (01): : 56 - 62
  • [39] Single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation in a professional soccer player
    Casagrande, Johnny
    Zoia, Cesare
    Clerici, Giulio
    Uccella, Laura
    Tabano, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2016, 56 (06): : 754 - 757
  • [40] Adjacent-Level Cervical Ossification After Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Garrido, Ben J.
    Wilhite, Jon
    Nakano, Masato
    Crawford, Charles
    Baldus, Christine
    Riew, K. Daniel
    Sasso, Rick C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (13): : 1185 - 1189