Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
|
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing the postoperative results of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc prosthesis and minimal invasive posterior cervical disc surgery
    Sertbas, Idris
    Karatay, Mete
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 34 (06) : 704 - 709
  • [22] Arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level cervical disc disease
    Karabag, Hamza
    Cakmak, Erkan
    Celik, Bahattin
    Iplikcioglu, Ahmet Celal
    Soran, Ahmet Faruk
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (12) : 1348 - 1351
  • [23] The 5-Year Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement A Markov Analysis
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Overley, Samuel
    Baird, Evan O.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    Zigler, Jack E.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (23) : 1924 - 1933
  • [24] Surgeon Specialty Differences in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Minhas, Shobhit V.
    Chow, Ian
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (20) : 1648 - 1655
  • [25] Comparison of Single- Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Radiculopathy
    Santangelo, Gabrielle
    Wathen, Connor
    Macaluso, Dominick
    Dagli, Mert Marcel
    Ali, Zarina S.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    Casper, David S.
    Spadola, Michael
    Ghenbot, Yohannes
    Thakkar, Khush
    Maze, Gabriella
    Welch, William C.
    Ozturk, Ali K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (03): : 418 - 425
  • [26] The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis
    Overley, Samuel C.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Brochin, Robert L.
    Kim, Jun S.
    Merrill, Robert K.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (01): : 63 - 71
  • [27] Adjacent-Level Ossification Development in Single-Level Standalone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate
    Huang, Christopher
    Mobbs, Ralph
    Selby, Michael
    Phan, Kevin
    Rao, Prashanth
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (03) : 292 - 298
  • [28] Comparison of clinical outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: a 10-year follow-up study
    Qi, Min
    Xu, Chen
    Liu, Yang
    Cao, Peng
    Wang, Xinwei
    Chen, Huajiang
    Yuan, Wen
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (03): : 361 - 368
  • [29] A Prospective Study of the Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion in Single Level Degenerative Cervical Disc Prolapse
    Kamani, Mayur M.
    Ballal, Arjun
    Shetty, Vikram
    Rai, H. Ravindranath
    Hegde, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (05) : RC1 - RC4
  • [30] Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Ponton, Ryan P.
    Gluf, Wayne M.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (05) : 1 - 6