Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
|
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty
    Arup K. Bhadra
    A. S. Raman
    Adrian T. H. Casey
    R. J. Crawford
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 232 - 237
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    McAnany, Steven
    Goz, Vadim
    Koehler, Steven M.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (05) : 546 - 554
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis
    Angevine, PD
    Zivin, JG
    McCormick, PC
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (17) : 1989 - 1997
  • [4] Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Tracey, Robert W.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Cody, John P.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Rosner, Michael K.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (11) : 1905 - 1908
  • [5] Investigating the 7-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Single-Level Cervical Disc Replacement Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Merrill, Robert K.
    Overley, Samuel C.
    Kim, Jun S.
    Brochin, Robert L.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Five Years After Surgery
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (06) : 471 - 475
  • [7] A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease
    Xing, Dan
    Ma, Xin-Long
    Ma, Jian-Xiong
    Wang, Jie
    Ma, Tao
    Chen, Yang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (07) : 970 - 978
  • [8] Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Tuchman, Alexander
    Chen, Ida
    Walker, Corey T.
    Kanim, Linda E.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Skaggs, David L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 40 (03) : 282 - 290
  • [9] Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Tuchman, Alexander
    Chen, Ida
    Walker, Corey T.
    Kanim, Linda E.
    Bae, Hyun W.
    Skaggs, David L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024, 40 (03) : 282 - 290
  • [10] Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Pandey, Praveen Kumar
    Pawar, Inder
    Gupta, Jyoti
    Verma, Raaghav Rai
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (01) : E41 - E49