Comparing the embolic potential of open and closed cell stents during carotid angioplasty and stenting

被引:20
|
作者
Tadros, Rami O. [1 ]
Spyris, Constantinos T. [1 ]
Vouyouka, Ageliki G. [1 ]
Chung, Christine [1 ]
Krishnan, Prakash [1 ]
Arnold, Margaret W. [1 ]
Marin, Michael L. [1 ]
Faries, Peter L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Vasc Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY; DESIGN; TRIAL; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.077
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We sought to determine the effects of open (O) and closed (C) cell stents on the size and number of embolic particles generated during carotid artery stenting (CAS) and assess the impact on outcome. Methods: Embolic debris from carotid filters after CAS was analyzed using photomicroscopy and imaging software. Patient comorbidities, preoperative cerebrovascular symptoms, stent type, and outcomes (perioperative major adverse events) were examined. Results: Carotid filters from 173 consecutive CAS procedures (O, 125 and C, 48) were reviewed. The mean age was 70.9 +/- 9.2 years; 58% were men. Mean stenosis was 88.2% +/- 8.1%; 36.6% had neurological symptoms preprocedurally. There was no difference in preoperative symptoms between the two groups (O, 38.7% vs C, 31.3%; P = not significant [NS]). However, closed cell stent use was associated with higher degree of stenosis (O, 87.2% +/- 8.0% vs C, 90.6% +/- 7.8%; P = .01), an older age (O, 70.0 +/- 8.6 years vs C, 73.4 +/- 10.2 years; P = .03), and peripheral arterial disease (21.1% vs 43.5%; P = .01). A larger mean particle size was observed in patients treated with open cell stents compared to closed cell stents (O, 416.5 +/- 335.7 mu m vs C, 301.1 +/- 251.3 mu m; P = .03). There was no significant difference in the total number of particles (O, 13.8 +/- 21.5 vs C, 17.6 +/- 19.9; P = NS), periprocedural stroke (P = NS), and major adverse events between the two groups (P = NS). Conclusions: Open cell stents are associated with a larger mean particle size compared to closed cell stents. No impact on procedural outcomes based on stent type was observed. (J Vasc Surg 2012;56:89-95.)
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Letter: Commentary: Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting Without Distal Embolic Protection Devices
    Binning, Mandy J.
    Veznedaroglu, Erol
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (03)
  • [32] CAROTID ANGIOPLASTY - DETECTION OF EMBOLIC SIGNALS DURING AND AFTER THE PROCEDURE
    MARKUS, HS
    CLIFTON, A
    BUCKENHAM, T
    BROWN, MM
    STROKE, 1994, 25 (12) : 2403 - 2406
  • [33] Timing and safety of angioplasty during carotid artery stenting
    Malas, Mahmoud
    Obeid, Tammam
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 14 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [34] Cerebral protection during open retrograde angioplasty/stenting of common carotid and innominate artery stenoses
    Payne, DA
    Hayes, PD
    Bolia, A
    Fishick, G
    Bell, PRF
    Naylor, AR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (02) : 187 - 190
  • [35] Open versus closed cell stents for carotid artery stenting (CAS): Does it really matter? Results from the German ALKK CAS registry
    Zahn, R.
    Ischinger, T.
    Jung, J.
    Hochadel, M.
    Zeymer, U.
    Mark, B.
    Hauptmann, K. E.
    Janicke, I.
    Senges, J.
    Mudra, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 981 - 981
  • [36] Carotid angioplasty in a pulsatile flow model: Factors affecting embolic potential
    Bicknell, CD
    Cowling, MG
    Clark, MW
    Delis, KT
    Jenkins, MP
    Hughes, AD
    Thom, SA
    Wolfe, JH
    Cheshire, NJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [37] Embolic potential in symptomatic patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting: evaluation of plaque instability through microscopic quantification of particulate debris
    Chung, Christine
    Shin, Hyun Joo
    Shah, Tejas R.
    Faries, Peter L.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [38] Use of a large angioplasty balloon for predilation is a risk factor for embolic complications in protected carotid stenting
    Sadato, A
    Satow, T
    Ishii, A
    Ohta, T
    Hashimoto, N
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2004, 44 (07) : 337 - 342
  • [39] Which embolic protection device is ideal during carotid artery stenting?
    Patel, Nachiket J.
    Heuser, Richard R.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (06) : 1136 - 1137
  • [40] Proximal embolic protection during carotid stenting: current devices and outcomes
    Kiang, S. C.
    De Rubertis, B. G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 53 (06): : 755 - 763