Mortality After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Devices

被引:5
|
作者
Padmanabhan, Deepak [1 ]
Jondal, Mary L. [2 ]
Hodge, David O. [4 ]
Mehta, Ramila A. [3 ]
Acker, Nancy G. [1 ]
Dalzell, Connie M. [1 ]
Kapa, Suraj [1 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [1 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [1 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [2 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
来源
关键词
cardiac implantable electronic devices; computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; mortality; outcomes; power on reset; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT; ELECTRONIC DEVICES; CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; EXPERT CONSENSUS; MR SAFETY; 1.5; T; RADIOLOGY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain is restricted in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). We proposed to determine whether mortality difference exists for patients with non-MRI-conditional CIEDs undergoing brain MRI compared with controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to compare all-cause mortality in patients with CIEDs undergoing brain MRI (CIED-MRI) with 3 control groups matched for age, sex, imaging year, and type of CIED: (1) no CIED, brain MRI (no-CIED-MRI); (2) CIED, brain computerized tomography (CT) scan (CIED-CT); and (3) no CIED, brain CT (no-CIED-CT). The primary outcome was a significant difference (P<0.05) between estimated mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were changes in device function before and after brain MRI. The estimated all-cause mortality at 5 years for the CIED-MRI group [mean age (+/- SD), 68.2 years (15.3 years); 61.2% men] was not significantly different from patients who underwent CT with or without a device (CIED-CT group: hazard ratio, 0.814; 95% confidence interval, 0.593-1.117; P=0.2; no-CIED-CT group: hazard ratio, 1.149; 95% confidence interval, 0.818-1.613; P=0.4). There was a significant increase in mortality between CIED-MRI and no-CIED-MRI groups (hazard ratio, 1.463; 95% confidence interval, 1.019-2.099; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Brain MRI in patients with CIEDs does not carry an increased mortality risk compared with brain CT and can be performed with adherence to appropriate procedural protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Contemporary Review
    Blissett, Sarah
    Chetrit, Michael
    Kovacina, Bojan
    Mardigyan, Vartan
    Afilalo, Jonathan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (12) : 1682 - 1686
  • [32] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    John V. Higgins
    Robert E. Watson
    Allan S. Jaffe
    Connie Dalzell
    Nancy Acker
    Joel P. Felmlee
    Samuel J. Asirvatham
    Yong-Mei Cha
    Paul A. Friedman
    Suraj Kapa
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 45 : 91 - 97
  • [33] Beyond the AJR: "Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads"
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (05) : 1247 - 1247
  • [34] Automatic consultation system for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Donghoon Han
    Ji Hyun Lee
    Il-Young Oh
    In-ho Chae
    Ho-Young Lee
    Youngjin Cho
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 21 (1)
  • [35] Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices: Challenges, Techniques, and Clinical Applications
    Gut, Pauline
    Cochet, Hubert
    Stuber, Matthias
    Bustin, Aurelien
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2024, 41 (11):
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in a cardio-oncology center
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    Dyrbus, Maciej
    Wojtynek, Elzbieta
    Wojtaszczyk, Adam
    Rutkowski, Tomasz
    Niedziela, Jacek
    Blachut, Aleksandra
    Jarzab, Michal
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Kurek, Anna
    Gorol, Jaroslaw
    Witek, Mateusz
    Skladowski, Krzysztof
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Bobek-Bilewicz, Barbara
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 81 (06) : 619 - 621
  • [37] Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Epicardial or Abandoned Leads
    Gakenheimer-Smith, Lindsey
    Etheridge, Susan
    Ou, Zhining
    Presson, Angela
    Whitaker, Patricia
    Su, Jason
    Puchalski, Michael
    Asaki, Sarah Y.
    Niu, Mary
    Pilcher, Thomas
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [38] CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AT 3T IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Yopes, Margot
    Nezafat, Reza
    Kramer, Daniel Bruce
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 1499 - 1499
  • [39] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination in People with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Gillam, Marianne H.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Pratt, Nicole L.
    Roughead, Elizabeth E.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 125 - 126
  • [40] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Higgins, John V.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Dalzell, Connie
    Acker, Nancy
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Kapa, Suraj
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (01) : 91 - 97