Mortality After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Devices

被引:5
|
作者
Padmanabhan, Deepak [1 ]
Jondal, Mary L. [2 ]
Hodge, David O. [4 ]
Mehta, Ramila A. [3 ]
Acker, Nancy G. [1 ]
Dalzell, Connie M. [1 ]
Kapa, Suraj [1 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [1 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [1 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [2 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
来源
关键词
cardiac implantable electronic devices; computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; mortality; outcomes; power on reset; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT; ELECTRONIC DEVICES; CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; EXPERT CONSENSUS; MR SAFETY; 1.5; T; RADIOLOGY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain is restricted in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). We proposed to determine whether mortality difference exists for patients with non-MRI-conditional CIEDs undergoing brain MRI compared with controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to compare all-cause mortality in patients with CIEDs undergoing brain MRI (CIED-MRI) with 3 control groups matched for age, sex, imaging year, and type of CIED: (1) no CIED, brain MRI (no-CIED-MRI); (2) CIED, brain computerized tomography (CT) scan (CIED-CT); and (3) no CIED, brain CT (no-CIED-CT). The primary outcome was a significant difference (P<0.05) between estimated mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were changes in device function before and after brain MRI. The estimated all-cause mortality at 5 years for the CIED-MRI group [mean age (+/- SD), 68.2 years (15.3 years); 61.2% men] was not significantly different from patients who underwent CT with or without a device (CIED-CT group: hazard ratio, 0.814; 95% confidence interval, 0.593-1.117; P=0.2; no-CIED-CT group: hazard ratio, 1.149; 95% confidence interval, 0.818-1.613; P=0.4). There was a significant increase in mortality between CIED-MRI and no-CIED-MRI groups (hazard ratio, 1.463; 95% confidence interval, 1.019-2.099; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Brain MRI in patients with CIEDs does not carry an increased mortality risk compared with brain CT and can be performed with adherence to appropriate procedural protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implantable Electronic Cardiac Devices and Compatibility With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Miller, Jared D.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (14) : 1590 - 1598
  • [22] Implantable Devices and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Can the Two Coexist?
    Walker, Matthew T.
    Rosenow, Joshua M.
    Benzon, Honorio T.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (05): : 1013 - 1015
  • [23] The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dandamudi, Sanjay
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Carr, James C.
    Mongkolwat, Pat
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Tomson, Todd T.
    Verma, Nishant
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alex B.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 1498 - 1505
  • [24] Synopsis of JBS recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Zghaib, Tarek
    Nazarian, Saman
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04) : 225 - 227
  • [25] Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Functional Integrity of Non-conditional Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dahiya, Garima
    Wetzel, Adam
    Kyvernitakis, Andreas
    Gevenosky, Loretta
    Williams, Ronald
    Shah, Moneal
    Farah, Victor
    Doyle, Mark
    Biederman, Robert
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [26] Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on functional integrity of non-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Dahiya, Garima
    Wetzel, Adam
    Kyvernitakis, Andreas
    Gevenosky, Loretta
    Williams, Ronald
    Shah, Moneal
    Farah, Victor
    Doyle, Mark
    Biederman, Robert W. W.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (08): : 1312 - 1319
  • [27] Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A promising method for detecting myocardial scar in patients with cardiac implantable devices
    Ye, Yong
    Zhang, Chang-cheng
    Zhao, Hai-xia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 292 : 271 - 271
  • [28] Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Magnetic Resonance-Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices What Can We See?
    Simonetti, Orlando P.
    Gross, David C.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 9 (05)
  • [29] Implantable Defibrillator System Shock Function, Mortality, and Cause of Death After Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Ra, Joshua
    Oberdier, Matt T. T.
    Suzuki, Masahito
    Vaidya, Dhananjay
    Liu, Yisi
    Hansford, Rozann
    McVeigh, Diana
    Weltin, Valeria
    Tao, Susumu
    Thiemann, David R.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [30] Considerations for stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chyou, Janice Y.
    Axel, Leon
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2136 - 2138