Early intervention to prevent long-term literacy difficulties: the case of Catch Up Literacy

被引:4
|
作者
Holmes, Wayne [1 ]
Reid, Dee [2 ]
Dowker, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford OX2 6PY, England
[2] Catch Up, Thetford IP24 1JD, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
关键词
reading difficulties; struggling readers; intervention; literacy; Catch Up Literacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.284
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Problem: Recent research indicates that about 17% of school leavers have significant literacy problems, a proportion that has not changed significantly in the last 20 years. Literacy problems are associated with increased risk of poverty, unemployment, criminal conviction, and ill-health. Most adults with literacy problems had difficulties in reading from the early stages of schooling onwards. Purpose of study: The purpose of the study was the evaluation of an intervention for children with reading difficulties. Catch Up Literacy is a structured one-to-one literacy intervention for learners from 6 to 13 who are struggling to learn to read. It involves all aspects of the reading process: word recognition processes and text comprehension processes. It is targeted to the needs of individual learners, identified through a bank of formative assessments, and involves two individual 15-minute sessions per week. Methods and Results: (1) Data was obtained for 3134 learners, in 27 local authorities, who received Catch Up Literacy support, and who were tested with the Salford Sentence Reading Test at the beginning and end of the intervention. Mean Chronological Age at the start of intervention was 86.51 months and mean Reading Age was 64.23. The mean gain in Reading Age after 7.33 months was 18.5 months (ratio gain 2.74). An independent t-test analysis showed that the learners had increased their Reading Age far more than expected by the passage of time alone. A follow-up study of 185 children ten years after intervention indicated that they had maintained their gains. (2) A more controlled study was carried out with 87 pupils in Years 7 and 8 in six secondary schools in Nottingham, with a total of 87 participants (aged 12 and 13). Over 4.01 months, a 'treatment' group (n=20) were given Catch Up Literacy support while a 'control' group (n = 67) received 'matched-time support' (additional literacy support of the teacher's choice, but not Catch Up Literacy, for approximately the same amount of time). The learners receiving Catch Up support started with a mean Reading Age of 85.7 months, and made a mean gain of 13.10 months (ratio gain 3.27). The matched-time controls started with a mean Reading Age of 88.92 months, and made a mean gain of 5.57 months (ratio gain 1.39). An independent t-test analysis of Reading Age ratio gains showed that the learners receiving Catch Up support achieved higher ratio gains than the matched-time controls. Conclusions and recommendations: There is clear evidence for the effectiveness of Catch Up Literacy and, more generally, for the view that early intervention with children with literacy difficulties may lead to significant lasting improvement, which may help to reduce the incidence of literacy difficulties in later life. Further research is needed to compare it to other interventions and to investigate factors that may influence the level of effectiveness, such as SES, initial chronological age, and initial Reading Age. There should also be more extensive and longer-term follow-up into adult life. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huseyin Uzunboylu
引用
收藏
页码:4498 / 4503
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation Takes Time: Reduction of Literacy Problems in Schools Implementing an Early-Literacy Intervention
    van der Weijden, Fae A.
    van den Boer, Madelon
    Zijlstra, Bonne J. H.
    de Jong, Peter F.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2024,
  • [42] Preschool classroom conversations as long-term resources for second language and literacy acquisition
    Aukrust, Vibeke Grover
    Rydland, Veslemoy
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 32 (04) : 198 - 207
  • [43] Transforming Literacy Education for Long-Term English Learners: Recognizing Brilliance in the Undervalued
    Smith, Kristin Conradi
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2022, 103 (08) : 70 - 70
  • [44] Long-term effects of catch-up growth and early nutritional intervention on the adiponectin level and insulin resistance in rats born small for gestational age
    Luo, Xiaoping
    Ying, Yanqin
    Zheng, Ruidan
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 2009, 72 : 335 - 335
  • [45] Early intervention in literacy: An in-class model for teachers
    King, JR
    Homan, S
    READING RESEARCH AND INSTRUCTION, 2003, 42 (03): : 32 - 51
  • [46] Examining the Nature of Scaffolding inan Early Literacy Intervention
    Rodgers, Emily
    D'Agostino, Jerome V.
    Harmey, Sinead J.
    Kelly, Robert H.
    Brownfield, Katherine
    READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 51 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [47] Professionals' perceptions of the role of literacy in early intervention services
    Thatcher, Karen
    Fletcher, Kathryn
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (07) : 600 - 608
  • [48] Literacy in Early Intervention: Satisfaction, Confidence, and Knowledge of OTs
    Carrlson, Bobbi
    Ozaki, Casey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2022, 76
  • [49] Does Early Surgical Intervention of Middle Ear Atelectasis Improve Long-term Results and Prevent Cholesteatoma?
    Saunders, James E.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2008, 134 (10) : 1040 - 1044
  • [50] The early intervention solution: Enabling or constraining literacy learning
    Woods, Annette
    Henderson, Robyn
    JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD LITERACY, 2008, 8 (03) : 251 - 268