Early intervention to prevent long-term literacy difficulties: the case of Catch Up Literacy

被引:4
|
作者
Holmes, Wayne [1 ]
Reid, Dee [2 ]
Dowker, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford OX2 6PY, England
[2] Catch Up, Thetford IP24 1JD, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
关键词
reading difficulties; struggling readers; intervention; literacy; Catch Up Literacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.284
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Problem: Recent research indicates that about 17% of school leavers have significant literacy problems, a proportion that has not changed significantly in the last 20 years. Literacy problems are associated with increased risk of poverty, unemployment, criminal conviction, and ill-health. Most adults with literacy problems had difficulties in reading from the early stages of schooling onwards. Purpose of study: The purpose of the study was the evaluation of an intervention for children with reading difficulties. Catch Up Literacy is a structured one-to-one literacy intervention for learners from 6 to 13 who are struggling to learn to read. It involves all aspects of the reading process: word recognition processes and text comprehension processes. It is targeted to the needs of individual learners, identified through a bank of formative assessments, and involves two individual 15-minute sessions per week. Methods and Results: (1) Data was obtained for 3134 learners, in 27 local authorities, who received Catch Up Literacy support, and who were tested with the Salford Sentence Reading Test at the beginning and end of the intervention. Mean Chronological Age at the start of intervention was 86.51 months and mean Reading Age was 64.23. The mean gain in Reading Age after 7.33 months was 18.5 months (ratio gain 2.74). An independent t-test analysis showed that the learners had increased their Reading Age far more than expected by the passage of time alone. A follow-up study of 185 children ten years after intervention indicated that they had maintained their gains. (2) A more controlled study was carried out with 87 pupils in Years 7 and 8 in six secondary schools in Nottingham, with a total of 87 participants (aged 12 and 13). Over 4.01 months, a 'treatment' group (n=20) were given Catch Up Literacy support while a 'control' group (n = 67) received 'matched-time support' (additional literacy support of the teacher's choice, but not Catch Up Literacy, for approximately the same amount of time). The learners receiving Catch Up support started with a mean Reading Age of 85.7 months, and made a mean gain of 13.10 months (ratio gain 3.27). The matched-time controls started with a mean Reading Age of 88.92 months, and made a mean gain of 5.57 months (ratio gain 1.39). An independent t-test analysis of Reading Age ratio gains showed that the learners receiving Catch Up support achieved higher ratio gains than the matched-time controls. Conclusions and recommendations: There is clear evidence for the effectiveness of Catch Up Literacy and, more generally, for the view that early intervention with children with literacy difficulties may lead to significant lasting improvement, which may help to reduce the incidence of literacy difficulties in later life. Further research is needed to compare it to other interventions and to investigate factors that may influence the level of effectiveness, such as SES, initial chronological age, and initial Reading Age. There should also be more extensive and longer-term follow-up into adult life. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huseyin Uzunboylu
引用
收藏
页码:4498 / 4503
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term outcome of oral language and phonological awareness intervention with socially disadvantaged preschoolers: the impact on language and literacy
    Henning, Caroline
    McIntosh, Beth
    Arnott, Wendy
    Dodd, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2010, 33 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [22] SCREENING EARLY LITERACY - IDEOLOGY, ILLUSION, AND INTERVENTION
    CROSSLAND, H
    EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1994, 46 (01) : 47 - 62
  • [23] Early Literacy: Conceptual Frameworks and Intervention Approaches
    Isik Uslu, A. Elif
    Tastekin, Ezgi
    Turan, Figen
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (03): : 922 - 941
  • [24] Mental health literacy, stigma, and early intervention
    Li, Huijun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 5 (03) : 209 - 210
  • [25] Using early literacy monitoring to prevent reading failure
    Sloat, Elizabeth A.
    Beswick, Joan F.
    Willms, J. Douglas
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2007, 88 (07) : 523 - 529
  • [26] AILEM Programme: a long-term intervention to promote literacy learning in low-performing primary schools in Chile
    Villalon Bravo, Malva
    Silva, Margarita
    Razmilic, Tonia
    Swartz, Stanley
    EARLY YEARS, 2005, 25 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [27] Empowering Long-Term ELs with Social Emotional Learning, Language, and Literacy
    Uysal, Huseyin
    TESOL JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [28] Long-term effects of preterm birth on language and literacy at eight years
    Guarini, Annalisa
    Sansavini, Alessandra
    Fabbri, Cristina
    Savini, Silvia
    Alessandroni, Rosina
    Faldella, Giacomo
    Karmiloff-Smith, Annette
    JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2010, 37 (04) : 865 - 885
  • [29] Subjective health literacy of long-term unemployed-a qualitative study
    Stassen, Gerrit
    Haass, Karsten
    Schaller, Andrea
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2024, 19 (01): : 68 - 74
  • [30] Impact of Health Literacy on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure
    Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Miyuki
    Matsuoka, Shiho
    Kayane, Takahiro
    Koizumi, Masako
    Yamada, Michiyo
    Okada, Akiko
    Yazawa, Miyuki
    Kinugawa, Shintaro
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130