The Importance of Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:29
|
作者
Hatayama, Kazuhisa [1 ]
Terauchi, Masanori [1 ]
Saito, Kenichi [2 ]
Higuchi, Hiroshi [3 ]
Yanagisawa, Shinya [2 ]
Takagishi, Kenji [2 ]
机构
[1] Social Insurance Gunma Chuo Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Maebashi, Gunma 3710025, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Maebashi, Gunma 371, Japan
[3] Asakura Sports Rehabil Clin, Dept Orthopaed Sports Surg, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
关键词
POSTEROLATERAL BUNDLES; KNEE; IMPINGEMENT; INSERTIONS; LANDMARKS; STABILITY; POSITION; OUTCOMES; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to measure the anterior edge of the tibial tunnel after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on lateral radiographs and to determine whether the difference in tibial tunnel placement affects postoperative outcomes. Methods: For 60 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon, we evaluated the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs, as well as rotational stability by the pivot-shift test, 2 years after surgery. Loss of extension (LOE) was evaluated on lateral radiographs of both knees in full extension, and graft integrity was assessed during second-look arthroscopy 1 to 2 years after surgery. On true lateral radiographs, we measured the anterior placement percentage of the tibial tunnel using the method described by Amis and Jakob. The cutoff value was set at 25% of the mean value of the anterior edge of the ACL that Amis and Jakob reported, and patients were divided into 2 groups (27 in the anterior group and 33 in the posterior group). Postoperative clinical results were compared between the groups. Results: The mean anterior placement percentage was 26.0% +/- 4.1%. The postoperative mean side-to-side difference was 1.4 +/- 2.7 mm for the anterior group and 3.0 +/- 2.7 mm for the posterior group, a significant difference (P < .05). The positive ratio of the pivot-shift test was not significantly different between groups (P > .05). Mean LOE in the anterior and posterior groups was 0.9 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees and -0.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees, respectively; the difference was not significant (P > .05). Five of 27 knees in the anterior group and 5 of 33 knees in the posterior group had superficial graft laceration or elongation, which was not significantly different (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterior placement of the tibial tunnel in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better anterior knee stability than posterior placement does. Anterior tibial tunnel placement inside the footprint did not increase the incidence of LOE and graft failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1078
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-tunnel anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has the same effectiveness as double femoral, double tibial tunnel: A prospective randomized study
    Xiang, Xianxiang
    Qu, Zhenan
    Sun, Honglin
    Ma, Xiaojun
    Wang, Weiming
    Huang, Lixin
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (11)
  • [42] Evaluating the Accuracy of Tibial Tunnel Placement After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Pedneault, Christopher
    Laverdiere, Carl
    Hart, Adam
    Boily, Mathieu
    Burman, Mark
    Martineau, Paul A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (13): : 3187 - 3194
  • [43] Comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Moghtadaei, M.
    Farahini, H.
    Jabalameli, M.
    Zangi, M.
    Siavashi, B.
    Bagherifard, A.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (03) : 201 - 207
  • [44] Tunnel location in transparent 3-dimensional CT in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the trans-tibial tunnel technique
    Inoue, Masayuki
    Tokuyasu, Shinichi
    Kuwahara, Sadatoshi
    Yasojima, Nobutoshi
    Kasahara, Yasuhiko
    Kondo, Eiji
    Onodere, Shin
    Yasuda, Kazunori
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2010, 18 (09) : 1176 - 1183
  • [45] Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Zelle, BA
    Brucker, PU
    Feng, MT
    Fu, FH
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [46] Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers
    Sahasrabudhe, Amit
    Christel, Pascal
    Anne, Francois
    Appleby, David
    Basdekis, Georges
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2010, 18 (11) : 1599 - 1606
  • [47] Anatomic Tunnel Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Dhawan, Aman
    Gallo, Robert A.
    Lynch, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (07) : 443 - 454
  • [48] Anatomic Double-Bundle Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System
    Tang, Jin
    Zhao, Jinzhong
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2024, 13 (08):
  • [49] Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allografts
    Vidal, Armando F.
    Brucker, Peter U.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 15 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [50] Double-bundle arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Longo, U. G.
    King, J. B.
    Denaro, V.
    Maffulli, N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (08): : 995 - 999