The Importance of Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:29
|
作者
Hatayama, Kazuhisa [1 ]
Terauchi, Masanori [1 ]
Saito, Kenichi [2 ]
Higuchi, Hiroshi [3 ]
Yanagisawa, Shinya [2 ]
Takagishi, Kenji [2 ]
机构
[1] Social Insurance Gunma Chuo Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Maebashi, Gunma 3710025, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Maebashi, Gunma 371, Japan
[3] Asakura Sports Rehabil Clin, Dept Orthopaed Sports Surg, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
关键词
POSTEROLATERAL BUNDLES; KNEE; IMPINGEMENT; INSERTIONS; LANDMARKS; STABILITY; POSITION; OUTCOMES; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to measure the anterior edge of the tibial tunnel after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on lateral radiographs and to determine whether the difference in tibial tunnel placement affects postoperative outcomes. Methods: For 60 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon, we evaluated the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs, as well as rotational stability by the pivot-shift test, 2 years after surgery. Loss of extension (LOE) was evaluated on lateral radiographs of both knees in full extension, and graft integrity was assessed during second-look arthroscopy 1 to 2 years after surgery. On true lateral radiographs, we measured the anterior placement percentage of the tibial tunnel using the method described by Amis and Jakob. The cutoff value was set at 25% of the mean value of the anterior edge of the ACL that Amis and Jakob reported, and patients were divided into 2 groups (27 in the anterior group and 33 in the posterior group). Postoperative clinical results were compared between the groups. Results: The mean anterior placement percentage was 26.0% +/- 4.1%. The postoperative mean side-to-side difference was 1.4 +/- 2.7 mm for the anterior group and 3.0 +/- 2.7 mm for the posterior group, a significant difference (P < .05). The positive ratio of the pivot-shift test was not significantly different between groups (P > .05). Mean LOE in the anterior and posterior groups was 0.9 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees and -0.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees, respectively; the difference was not significant (P > .05). Five of 27 knees in the anterior group and 5 of 33 knees in the posterior group had superficial graft laceration or elongation, which was not significantly different (P > .05). Conclusions: Anterior placement of the tibial tunnel in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better anterior knee stability than posterior placement does. Anterior tibial tunnel placement inside the footprint did not increase the incidence of LOE and graft failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1078
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Notchplasty in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Koga, Hideyuki
    Muneta, Takeshi
    Yagishita, Kazuyoshi
    Watanabe, Toshifumi
    Mochizuki, Tomoyuki
    Horie, Masafumi
    Nakamura, Tomomasa
    Sekiya, Ichiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (08): : 1813 - 1821
  • [22] Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament volume after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lee, Byung Hoon
    Jangir, Rajat
    Kim, Hun Yeong
    Shin, Jung Min
    Chang, Minho
    Kim, Kwon
    Wang, Joon Ho
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (03): : 580 - 587
  • [23] Radiologic evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels created with the transtibial tunnel technique for Anatomic double-bundle anterior Cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Kondo, Eiji
    Yasuda, Kazunori
    Ichiyama, Hiroki
    Azuma, Chinatsu
    Tohyama, Harukazu
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (08): : 869 - 876
  • [24] Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Nau, Thomas
    Spotswood, Matthew
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2007, 15 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [25] Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Double-Bundle Reconstruction Using 2 Tibial and 2 Femoral Tunnels
    Ferretti, Mario
    Zelle, Boris A.
    Chhabra, Anikar
    Fu, Freddie H.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [26] Anatomic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Chahla, Jorge
    Nitri, Marco
    Civitarese, David
    Dean, Chase S.
    Moulton, Samuel G.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2016, 5 (01): : E149 - E156
  • [27] Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Where Are We Today?
    Pombo, Mathew W.
    Shen, Wei
    Fu, Freddie H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (10): : 1168 - 1177
  • [28] Migration of EndoButton After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Mae, Tatsuo
    Kuroda, Sanae
    Matsumoto, Norinao
    Yoneda, Minoru
    Nakata, Ken
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Shino, Konsei
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (11): : 1528 - 1535
  • [29] Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The University of Pittsburgh Approach
    Romanowski, James R.
    Wong, Andrew K.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 17 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [30] Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis anterior allograft
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios Paul
    Buoncristiani, Anthony
    Starman, James S.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 15 (02) : 62 - 67