Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study

被引:22
|
作者
Maged, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Ragab, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Shohayeb, Amal [1 ]
Saber, Waleed [1 ]
Ekladious, Sherif [2 ]
Hussein, Eman A. [1 ]
El-Mazny, Akmal [1 ]
Hany, Ayman [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Clin Pathol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Dual trigger; GnRH‐ antagonist protocol; ICSI; Poor responders; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; HORMONE AGONIST; OOCYTE MATURATION; OVARIAN RESPONSE; PROTOCOL; IMPROVES; WOMEN; START; HCG; FSH;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.13405
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can improve the number of retrieved oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. Methods A randomized controlled trial included poor ovarian responders indicated for ICSI using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. They were divided equally into two groups: group I received 10 000 units of hCG plus 0.2 mg of triptorelin while group II received 10 000 units of hCG only for triggering of ovulation. The primary outcome parameter was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included metaphase II oocytes number, cancellation rate, number of obtained embryos, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. Results One hundred and sixty women were included in the study, with 80 women in each treatment group. Dual triggering was associated with higher number of retrieved oocytes (5.3 +/- 1.9 vs 4.5 +/- 2.4, P=0.014), metaphase II oocytes (3.8 +/- 1.4 vs 3.1 +/- 1.7, P=0.004), total and grade 1 embryos (2.7 +/- 1.1 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 vs 1.9 +/- 1.2 and 1.1 +/- 0.2, P=0.001 and 0.021 respectively), and transferred embryos (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 1.6 +/- 0.9, P=0.043, and lower cancellation rate (7.5% vs 20%, P=0.037) compared with single triggering. There were significantly higher chemical (25% vs 11.3%, P=0.039) and clinical (22.5% vs 8.8%, P=0.028) pregnancy rates in women with dual triggering compared with those with single triggering. Conclusion Dual triggering is associated with better IVF outcome in poor responders compared with single trigger.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Maged, Ahmed M.
    Nada, Adel M.
    Abohamila, Fouad
    Hashem, Ahmed T.
    Mostafa, Walaa A. I.
    Elzayat, Ahmed R.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (12) : 1627 - 1631
  • [32] GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final follicular maturation: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study
    Haas, J.
    Bassil, R.
    Samara, N.
    Zilberberg, E.
    Mehta, C.
    Orvieto, R.
    Casper, R. F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (07) : 1648 - 1654
  • [33] Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles
    Lin, Ming-Huei
    Wu, Frank Shao-Ying
    Lee, Robert Kuo-Kuang
    Li, Sheng-Hsiang
    Lin, Shyr-Yeu
    Hwu, Yuh-Ming
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (05) : 1296 - 1302
  • [34] Cycle outcomes of dual trigger (GnRH agonist plus hCG) versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger alone in POSEDION group 3-4 poor-responders and normo-responders: A prospective randomized study
    Keskin, Muege
    Ecemis, Tolga
    Atik, Ahmet
    Yegen, Pelin
    Kalkan, Ece
    Yucel, Gamze Sinem
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (08)
  • [35] Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles:: a prospective randomized study
    Cédrin-Durnerin, I
    Grange-Dujardin, D
    Laffy, A
    Parneix, I
    Massin, N
    Galey, J
    Théron, L
    Wolf, JP
    Conord, C
    Clément, P
    Jayot, S
    Hugues, JN
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (09) : 1979 - 1984
  • [36] First Randomized study comparing single versus daily GnRH antagonist.
    Rongieres, C
    Ohl, J
    Bettahar, K
    Moreau, L
    Wittemer, C
    Nisand, I
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S38 - S38
  • [37] Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles
    Chen, C. H.
    Tzeng, C. R.
    Wang, P. H.
    Liu, W. M.
    Chang, H. Y.
    Chen, H. H.
    Chen, C. H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 310 - 310
  • [38] Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: a prospective randomized study
    Siristatidis, C.
    Salamalekis, G.
    Dafopoulos, K.
    Basios, G.
    Vogiatzi, P.
    Papantoniou, N.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 438 - 439
  • [39] EARLY GNRH-ANTAGONIST INITIATION DOES NOT IMPROVE PREGNANCY RATES OF PCOS CASES UNDERGOING IVF/ICSI: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.
    Atabekoglu, C. S.
    Kocbulut, E.
    Pabuccu, E. G.
    Ozmen, B.
    Berker, B.
    Sonmezer, M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E325 - E325
  • [40] Single-dose GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of GnRH antagonist cycles: a prospective randomized study
    Isik, A. Z.
    Caglar, G. S.
    Sozen, E.
    Akarsu, C.
    Tuncay, G.
    Ozbicer, T.
    Vicdan, K.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 19 (04) : 472 - 477