Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study

被引:22
|
作者
Maged, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Ragab, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Shohayeb, Amal [1 ]
Saber, Waleed [1 ]
Ekladious, Sherif [2 ]
Hussein, Eman A. [1 ]
El-Mazny, Akmal [1 ]
Hany, Ayman [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Clin Pathol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Dual trigger; GnRH‐ antagonist protocol; ICSI; Poor responders; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; HORMONE AGONIST; OOCYTE MATURATION; OVARIAN RESPONSE; PROTOCOL; IMPROVES; WOMEN; START; HCG; FSH;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.13405
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can improve the number of retrieved oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. Methods A randomized controlled trial included poor ovarian responders indicated for ICSI using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. They were divided equally into two groups: group I received 10 000 units of hCG plus 0.2 mg of triptorelin while group II received 10 000 units of hCG only for triggering of ovulation. The primary outcome parameter was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included metaphase II oocytes number, cancellation rate, number of obtained embryos, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. Results One hundred and sixty women were included in the study, with 80 women in each treatment group. Dual triggering was associated with higher number of retrieved oocytes (5.3 +/- 1.9 vs 4.5 +/- 2.4, P=0.014), metaphase II oocytes (3.8 +/- 1.4 vs 3.1 +/- 1.7, P=0.004), total and grade 1 embryos (2.7 +/- 1.1 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 vs 1.9 +/- 1.2 and 1.1 +/- 0.2, P=0.001 and 0.021 respectively), and transferred embryos (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 1.6 +/- 0.9, P=0.043, and lower cancellation rate (7.5% vs 20%, P=0.037) compared with single triggering. There were significantly higher chemical (25% vs 11.3%, P=0.039) and clinical (22.5% vs 8.8%, P=0.028) pregnancy rates in women with dual triggering compared with those with single triggering. Conclusion Dual triggering is associated with better IVF outcome in poor responders compared with single trigger.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GnRH agonist trigger in PCOS undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonist cycles: single dose vs. double dose - a randomized pilot study
    Deepika, K.
    Snehal, D.
    Baiju, P.
    Navyashri, M. S.
    Khushbu, P.
    Nivedita, S.
    Suvarna, R.
    Bhagyashree, P.
    Amit, U.
    Anjali, G.
    Divyashree, P. S.
    Anu, K.
    Gautam, P.
    Kamini, R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 433 - 433
  • [22] MICRODOSE GnRH AGONIST FLARE-UP VERSUS FLEXIBLE GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN-VITRO-FERTILIZATION (IVF) CYCLES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Malhotra, N.
    Singh, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S106 - S106
  • [23] LETROZOLE IN POOR RESPONDERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH PREVIOUS CYCLES
    Ersahin, A.
    Gorgen, B.
    Kahraman, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S508 - S508
  • [24] RCT of Dual-Triger (GnRH-Agonist & hCG) versus hCG-Trigger alone for Normal Responders in IVF-ICSI Cycles
    Singh, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I522 - I523
  • [25] Estradiol Pretreatment in an Ultrashort GnRH Combined with a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in A Cohort of Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI: A Case-control Study
    Siristatidis, Charalampos
    Salamalekis, George
    Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
    Vrantza, Tereza
    Matsota, Paraskevi
    Pergialiotis, Vasileios
    Papantoniou, Nikolaos
    IN VIVO, 2016, 30 (06): : 945 - 950
  • [26] Low progesterone value on day of hCG yields increased implantation and live birth rate in high responders compared to poor responders in GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles
    Chimote, N. N.
    Mehta-Chimote, B. N.
    Nath, N.
    Chimote, N. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 228 - 229
  • [27] Comparison between the outcome of short down-regulation protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF cycles of poor responders
    Mohamed, K.
    Allsopp, J.
    Davies, R.
    Lashen, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 105 - 105
  • [28] Luteal estradiol versus follicular GnRH antagonist for ovarian follicular synchronization in POSEIDON poor responders: a multicentric randomized controlled trial
    Goel, K.
    Mantravadi, K. C.
    Gedela, D. R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [29] Myoinositol versus metformin pretreatment in GnRH-antagonist cycle for women with PCOS undergoing IVF: a double-blinded randomized controlled study
    Rajasekaran, Keerthana
    Malhotra, Neena
    Mahey, Reeta
    Khadgawat, Rajesh
    Kalaivani, Mani
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 38 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [30] Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ahmed M. Maged
    Adel M. Nada
    Fouad Abohamila
    Ahmed T. Hashem
    Walaa AI Mostafa
    Ahmed R. Elzayat
    Reproductive Sciences, 2015, 22 : 1627 - 1631