Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study

被引:22
|
作者
Maged, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Ragab, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Shohayeb, Amal [1 ]
Saber, Waleed [1 ]
Ekladious, Sherif [2 ]
Hussein, Eman A. [1 ]
El-Mazny, Akmal [1 ]
Hany, Ayman [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Kasr Alainy Hosp, Clin Pathol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Dual trigger; GnRH‐ antagonist protocol; ICSI; Poor responders; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; HORMONE AGONIST; OOCYTE MATURATION; OVARIAN RESPONSE; PROTOCOL; IMPROVES; WOMEN; START; HCG; FSH;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.13405
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can improve the number of retrieved oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. Methods A randomized controlled trial included poor ovarian responders indicated for ICSI using a GnRH-antagonist protocol. They were divided equally into two groups: group I received 10 000 units of hCG plus 0.2 mg of triptorelin while group II received 10 000 units of hCG only for triggering of ovulation. The primary outcome parameter was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included metaphase II oocytes number, cancellation rate, number of obtained embryos, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. Results One hundred and sixty women were included in the study, with 80 women in each treatment group. Dual triggering was associated with higher number of retrieved oocytes (5.3 +/- 1.9 vs 4.5 +/- 2.4, P=0.014), metaphase II oocytes (3.8 +/- 1.4 vs 3.1 +/- 1.7, P=0.004), total and grade 1 embryos (2.7 +/- 1.1 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 vs 1.9 +/- 1.2 and 1.1 +/- 0.2, P=0.001 and 0.021 respectively), and transferred embryos (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 1.6 +/- 0.9, P=0.043, and lower cancellation rate (7.5% vs 20%, P=0.037) compared with single triggering. There were significantly higher chemical (25% vs 11.3%, P=0.039) and clinical (22.5% vs 8.8%, P=0.028) pregnancy rates in women with dual triggering compared with those with single triggering. Conclusion Dual triggering is associated with better IVF outcome in poor responders compared with single trigger.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of a "Dual Trigger" Using a GnRH Agonist and hCG on the Cumulative Live-Birth Rate for Normal Responders in GnRH-Antagonist Cycles
    Gao, Fumei
    Wang, Yanbin
    Fu, Min
    Zhang, Qiuxiang
    Ren, Yumeng
    Shen, Huan
    Han, Hongjing
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [2] GnRH agonist trigger versus hCG trigger in GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycles: A review article
    Alyasin, Ashraf
    Mehdinejadiani, Shayesteh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 14 (09) : 557 - 566
  • [3] Luteal phase support with estradiol and progesterone versus progesterone alone in GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles: a randomized controlled study
    Madkour, Wael A. Ismail
    Noah, Bassel
    Hamid, Amr M. S. Abdel
    Zaheer, Hena
    Al-Bahr, Awatif
    Shaeer, Mahmoud
    Moawad, Ashraf
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2016, 19 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [4] Oestradiol valerate pretreatment in GnRH-antagonist cycles: a randomized controlled trial
    Blockeel, Christophe
    Engels, Sara
    De Vos, Michel
    Haentjens, Patrick
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Stoop, Dominic
    Camus, Michel
    Devroey, Paul
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 24 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [5] Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
    Mohammad, Ehab H.
    Serour, Ahmed G. Abou El
    Mohamed, Eman A. H.
    Abbasy, Amr H.
    Zaatar, Mahmoud
    Rageh, Kamal A.
    Shafeek, Mohamed M.
    Issak, Emad R.
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 60 (01): : 51 - 55
  • [6] GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial
    Cheung, LP
    Lam, PM
    Lok, IH
    Chiu, TTY
    Yeung, SY
    Tjer, CC
    Haines, CJ
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) : 616 - 621
  • [7] GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist in elective single embryo transfer IVF cycles
    Fatemi, H. Mousavi
    Papanikolaou, E. G.
    Tournaye, H.
    Camus, M.
    Verpoest, W.
    Donoso, P.
    Van der Elst, J.
    Devroey, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I5 - I5
  • [8] Dual trigger of final oocyte maturation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles
    Zhang, Jie
    Wang, Yun
    Mao, Xiaoyan
    Chen, Qiuju
    Hong, Qingqing
    Cai, Renfei
    Zhang, Shaozhen
    Kuang, Yanping
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (06) : 701 - 707
  • [9] Triggering of ovulation for GnRH-antagonist cycles in normal and low ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    He, Fang-Fang
    Hu, Wenhui
    Yong, Lin
    Li, Yu-Mei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 289 : 65 - 73
  • [10] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study
    Prapas, N
    Prapas, Y
    Panagiotidis, Y
    Prapa, S
    Vanderzwalmen, P
    Schoysman, R
    Makedos, G
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 1516 - 1520