Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries

被引:14
|
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Albers, Lucia [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Umea Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
关键词
lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LLIF; intraoperative neuromonitoring; IONM; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RESPECT; PLEXUS; ARTHRODESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently used for anterior column stabilization. Many authors have reported that intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the lumbar plexus nerves is mandatory for this approach. However, even with IONM, the reported motor and sensory deficits are still considerably high. Thus, the authors' approach was to focus on the indication, trajectory, and technique instead of relying on IONM findings per se. The objective of this study therefore was to analyze the outcome of our large cohort of patients who underwent LLIF without IONM. METHODS The authors report on 157 patients included from 2010 to 2016 who underwent LLIF as an additional stabilizing procedure following dorsal instrumentation. LLIF-related complications as well as clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 15.9 +/- 12.0 months. For 90.0% of patients, cage implantation by LLIF was the first retroperitoneal surgery. There were no cases of surgery-related hematoma, vascular injury, CSF leak, or any other visceral injury. Between 1 and 4 cages were implanted per surgery, most commonly at L2-3 and L3-4. The mean length of surgery was 92.7 +/- 35 minutes, and blood loss was 63.8 +/- 57 ml. At discharge, 3.8% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness, a new sensory deficit, or the deterioration of leg pain due to LLIF surgery. Three months after surgery, 3.5% of the followed patients still reported surgery-related motor weakness, 3.6% leg pain, and 9.6% a persistent sensory deficit due to LLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series demonstrate that the complication rates for LLIF without IONM are comparable, if not superior, to those in previously reported series using IONM. Hence, the authors conclude that IONM is not mandatory for LLIF procedures if the surgical approach is tailored to the respective level and if the visualization of nerves is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards a More Realistic Appraisal of Complications Following Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single Institution Series
    Godolias, Periklis
    Frieler, Sven
    Tataryn, Zachary L.
    McBride, Paul
    Nunna, Ravi
    Ghayoumi, Pouriya
    Charlot, Kaarina
    Tran, Angela
    Al-Awadi, Hamzah
    Gerstmeyer, Julius R.
    Ruetten, Sebastian
    Chapman, Jens R.
    Oskouian, Rod J.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [42] Intraoperative Myelography in Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Preliminary Prospective Study
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Liangming
    Dong, Jianwen
    Chen, Zihao
    Xie, Peigen
    Chen, Ruiqiang
    He, Lei
    Feng, Feng
    Rong, Limin
    Liu, Bin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [43] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgeries: A Single-Center Experience of 171 Consecutive Cases
    Choi, Kyung Hwa
    Ham, Won Sik
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Lee, Jae Won
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Arkoncel, Francis Raymond P.
    Yang, Seung Choul
    Han, Woong Kyu
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [44] Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: A single-center retrospective comparative study
    Du, Xing
    Ou, Yun-sheng
    Zhu, Yong
    Luo, Wei
    Jiang, Guan-yin
    Jiang, Dian-ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 83 : 39 - 46
  • [45] Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Saadeh, Yamaan S.
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    Kirsch, Michael J.
    Sabbagh, Amr M.
    Park, Paul
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E1374 - E1378
  • [46] Single Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of the Current Literature
    Jacome, Freddy P.
    Lee, Justin J.
    Hiltzik, David M.
    Cho, Sia
    Pagadala, Manasa
    Hsu, Wellington K.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (09) : 386 - 392
  • [47] Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation
    Oujie Lai
    Yunlin Chen
    Qixin Chen
    Yong Hu
    Weihu Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [48] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cage Retrieval for the Treatment of Pseudarthrosis After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series
    Tumialan, Luis Manuel
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 20 (02) : 172 - 173
  • [49] Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation
    Lai, Oujie
    Chen, Yunlin
    Chen, Qixin
    Hu, Yong
    Ma, Weihu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [50] Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Results of Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series
    Ehresman, Jeff
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Battista, Madison
    Lee, Katriel E.
    Lee, Bryan S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (04) : 763 - 768