Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries

被引:14
|
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Albers, Lucia [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Umea Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
关键词
lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LLIF; intraoperative neuromonitoring; IONM; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RESPECT; PLEXUS; ARTHRODESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently used for anterior column stabilization. Many authors have reported that intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the lumbar plexus nerves is mandatory for this approach. However, even with IONM, the reported motor and sensory deficits are still considerably high. Thus, the authors' approach was to focus on the indication, trajectory, and technique instead of relying on IONM findings per se. The objective of this study therefore was to analyze the outcome of our large cohort of patients who underwent LLIF without IONM. METHODS The authors report on 157 patients included from 2010 to 2016 who underwent LLIF as an additional stabilizing procedure following dorsal instrumentation. LLIF-related complications as well as clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 15.9 +/- 12.0 months. For 90.0% of patients, cage implantation by LLIF was the first retroperitoneal surgery. There were no cases of surgery-related hematoma, vascular injury, CSF leak, or any other visceral injury. Between 1 and 4 cages were implanted per surgery, most commonly at L2-3 and L3-4. The mean length of surgery was 92.7 +/- 35 minutes, and blood loss was 63.8 +/- 57 ml. At discharge, 3.8% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness, a new sensory deficit, or the deterioration of leg pain due to LLIF surgery. Three months after surgery, 3.5% of the followed patients still reported surgery-related motor weakness, 3.6% leg pain, and 9.6% a persistent sensory deficit due to LLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series demonstrate that the complication rates for LLIF without IONM are comparable, if not superior, to those in previously reported series using IONM. Hence, the authors conclude that IONM is not mandatory for LLIF procedures if the surgical approach is tailored to the respective level and if the visualization of nerves is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview
    Hanneke I. Berends
    Henricus L. Journée
    Ilona Rácz
    Jan van Loon
    Roger Härtl
    Maarten Spruit
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 1581 - 1586
  • [32] Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview
    Berends, Hanneke I.
    Journee, Henricus L.
    Racz, Ilona
    van Loon, Jan
    Hartl, Roger
    Spruit, Maarten
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1581 - 1586
  • [33] Single-Position Anterior Column Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lopez, Gregory
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Phillips, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 : S17 - S25
  • [34] Intraoperative ultrasound guidance assisted oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Pu, Xingxiao
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Wang, Xiandi
    Geng, Cheng-Kui
    Liu, Bailian
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2023, 177
  • [35] Effectiveness of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in a Patient Undergoing a One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Report
    Michael, Mark
    Stark, Michael
    Woods, Barrett
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [36] Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Tao, Yiqing
    Li, Fangcai
    Chen, Qixin
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 85 : 84 - 91
  • [37] Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series
    Proietti, Luca
    Perna, Andrea
    Ricciardi, Luca
    Fumo, Caterina
    Santagada, Domenico Alessandro
    Giannelli, Ilaria
    Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro
    Leone, Antonio
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (02): : 250 - 257
  • [38] Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series
    Luca Proietti
    Andrea Perna
    Luca Ricciardi
    Caterina Fumo
    Domenico Alessandro Santagada
    Ilaria Giannelli
    Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
    Antonio Leone
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 250 - 257
  • [39] Screw Stimulation Thresholds for Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Correlational Study
    Abbasi, Hamid
    Moore, Dominic J.
    Rajaeirad, Mohadese
    Zhan, Jiawen
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [40] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5
    Jang, Hae-Dong
    Lee, Jae Chul
    Seo, Jong-Hyeon
    Roh, Young-Ho
    Choi, Sung-Woo
    Shin, Byung-Joon
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E10 - E18