Comparison of iron and steel production energy use and energy intensity in China and the U.S.

被引:80
|
作者
Hasanbeigi, Ali [1 ]
Price, Lynn [1 ]
Zhang Chunxia [2 ]
Aden, Nathaniel [1 ]
Li Xiuping [2 ]
Fangqin, Shangguan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Environm Energy Technol Div, China Energy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] China Iron & Steel Res Inst, State Key Lab Adv Steel Proc & Prod, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy intensity; Iron and steel industry; Technology structure; Comparison methodology; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to develop a methodology for making an accurate comparison of the energy intensity of steel production in China and the U.S. Such values are often sought by policy-makers when making decisions related to energy, greenhouse gases, and competitiveness. The methodology addresses issues related to boundary definitions, conversion factors, and technology structure. In addition to the base case analysis, four sensitivity and two factor analyses were developed to assess the effect of different factors on energy intensities. The results of the analysis show that for the whole iron and steel production process, the final energy intensity in 2006 was equal to 14.90 GJ/t crude steel in the U.S. and 23.11 GJ/t crude steel in China in the base-case analysis. In another factor analysis that assumed the Chinese share of electric arc furnace production in 2006 (10.5%) in the U.S., the energy intensity of steel production in the U.S. increased by 54% to 22.96 GJ/t crude steel. This result highlights the fact that when comparing the energy intensity of the U.S and Chinese steel industry, the technology structure, especially the share of electric arc furnace should be taken into account. A number of policy implications are also discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 119
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] U.S. energy: Overview and key statistics
    Behrens, Carl E.
    Glover, Carol
    Fossil Fuels: Competition and Elasticities, 2012, : 61 - 95
  • [32] Energy Balance of a Typical U.S. Diet
    Alexandrou, Athanasios
    Tenbergen, Klaus
    Adhikari, Diganta
    FOODS, 2013, 2 (02): : 132 - 142
  • [33] The U.S. energy policy finally emerges
    Wright, Andrew G., 1600, McGraw-Hill Companies (272):
  • [34] Overlapping authorities in U.S. energy policy
    Fowler L.
    Johnson A.T.
    Electricity Journal, 2017, 30 (09): : 1 - 5
  • [35] Key Considerations for U.S. Energy Policy
    Dewhurst, Charles
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2013, 111 (11A) : A3 - A4
  • [36] A comprehensive U.S. Energy policy [1]
    Burk, M.
    Deitchman, S.J.
    2001, American Association for the Advancement of Science (291)
  • [37] U.S. Steel production and the natural rate hypothesis
    Gallet C.
    Atlantic Economic Journal, 1997, 25 (2) : 224 - 224
  • [38] U.S. Department of Energy security technologies
    Smith, GD
    Piechowski, CJ
    Pocratsky, CA
    Sparks, MH
    35TH ANNUAL 2001 INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 19 - 26
  • [39] The effect of global climate change, population distribution, and climate mitigation on building energy use in the U.S. and China
    Yuyu Zhou
    Jiyong Eom
    Leon Clarke
    Climatic Change, 2013, 119 : 979 - 992
  • [40] Assessment of U.S. Electric End-Use Energy Efficiency Potential
    Gellings, Clark W.
    Wikler, Greg
    Ghosh, Debyani
    Electricity Journal, 2006, 19 (09): : 55 - 69