Comparison of iron and steel production energy use and energy intensity in China and the U.S.

被引:80
|
作者
Hasanbeigi, Ali [1 ]
Price, Lynn [1 ]
Zhang Chunxia [2 ]
Aden, Nathaniel [1 ]
Li Xiuping [2 ]
Fangqin, Shangguan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Environm Energy Technol Div, China Energy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] China Iron & Steel Res Inst, State Key Lab Adv Steel Proc & Prod, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy intensity; Iron and steel industry; Technology structure; Comparison methodology; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to develop a methodology for making an accurate comparison of the energy intensity of steel production in China and the U.S. Such values are often sought by policy-makers when making decisions related to energy, greenhouse gases, and competitiveness. The methodology addresses issues related to boundary definitions, conversion factors, and technology structure. In addition to the base case analysis, four sensitivity and two factor analyses were developed to assess the effect of different factors on energy intensities. The results of the analysis show that for the whole iron and steel production process, the final energy intensity in 2006 was equal to 14.90 GJ/t crude steel in the U.S. and 23.11 GJ/t crude steel in China in the base-case analysis. In another factor analysis that assumed the Chinese share of electric arc furnace production in 2006 (10.5%) in the U.S., the energy intensity of steel production in the U.S. increased by 54% to 22.96 GJ/t crude steel. This result highlights the fact that when comparing the energy intensity of the U.S and Chinese steel industry, the technology structure, especially the share of electric arc furnace should be taken into account. A number of policy implications are also discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 119
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENERGY SAVING IN IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTION
    EKETORP, S
    KEMISK TIDSKRIFT, 1976, 88 (06): : 54 - &
  • [22] China to U.S.: Use Private Capital
    Forbes, Steve
    FORBES, 2012, 189 (07): : 15 - 17
  • [23] A Global Industrial Rebalance: China, the U.S. and Energy-intensive Manufacturing
    Tan, Hao
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2018, 16 (10):
  • [24] U.S. Department of Energy's Role in the Energy-Water Nexus
    Sehlke, Gerald
    Wichlacz, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2009, 143 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [25] A Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Inertial Fusion Energy Program
    Rulon Linford
    Riccardo Betti
    Jill Dahlburg
    James Asay
    Michael Campbell
    Phillip Colella
    Jeffrey Freidberg
    Jeremy Goodman
    David Hammer
    Joseph Hoagland
    Steve Jardin
    John Lindl
    Grant Logan
    Keith Matzen
    Gerald Navratil
    Arthur Nobile
    John Sethian
    John Sheffield
    Mark Tillack
    Jon Weisheit
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 2003, 22 : 93 - 126
  • [26] U.S. energy security: Problems and policies
    Toman, Michael A.
    Gruenspecht, Howard
    Revue de l'Energie, 2002, (542): : 728 - 734
  • [27] U.S. Petroleum Security and Energy Independence
    Chanis, Jonathan
    AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS, 2012, 34 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [28] U.S. energy policy and the pursuit of failure
    Hultquist, Andy
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2014, 28 (04) : 382 - 383
  • [29] Ethanol production: Energy and economic issues related to U.S. and Brazilian sugarcane
    Pimentel D.
    Patzek T.
    Natural Resources Research, 2007, 16 (3) : 235 - 242
  • [30] U.S. energy: Overview and key statistics
    Behrens, Carl E.
    Glover, Carol
    United States Energy Security, 2012, : 53 - 88