Comparison of iron and steel production energy use and energy intensity in China and the U.S.

被引:80
|
作者
Hasanbeigi, Ali [1 ]
Price, Lynn [1 ]
Zhang Chunxia [2 ]
Aden, Nathaniel [1 ]
Li Xiuping [2 ]
Fangqin, Shangguan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Environm Energy Technol Div, China Energy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] China Iron & Steel Res Inst, State Key Lab Adv Steel Proc & Prod, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy intensity; Iron and steel industry; Technology structure; Comparison methodology; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to develop a methodology for making an accurate comparison of the energy intensity of steel production in China and the U.S. Such values are often sought by policy-makers when making decisions related to energy, greenhouse gases, and competitiveness. The methodology addresses issues related to boundary definitions, conversion factors, and technology structure. In addition to the base case analysis, four sensitivity and two factor analyses were developed to assess the effect of different factors on energy intensities. The results of the analysis show that for the whole iron and steel production process, the final energy intensity in 2006 was equal to 14.90 GJ/t crude steel in the U.S. and 23.11 GJ/t crude steel in China in the base-case analysis. In another factor analysis that assumed the Chinese share of electric arc furnace production in 2006 (10.5%) in the U.S., the energy intensity of steel production in the U.S. increased by 54% to 22.96 GJ/t crude steel. This result highlights the fact that when comparing the energy intensity of the U.S and Chinese steel industry, the technology structure, especially the share of electric arc furnace should be taken into account. A number of policy implications are also discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 119
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy Use in the U.S. Food System
    Charney, Madeleine
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & FOOD INFORMATION, 2011, 12 (02) : 206 - 207
  • [2] U.S. Internal Migration, Energy Use, and Emissions
    Reinhardt, Cody Karl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2023, 28 (02):
  • [3] The U.S. Frontier Observatory For Research in Geothermal Energy project and comparison of typical EGS site exploration status in China and U.S.
    Zhang S.
    Wen D.
    Xu T.
    Fu L.
    Jia X.
    Sun S.
    Weng W.
    Zhang Y.
    Yang T.
    Moore J.
    Jiang S.
    Allis R.
    Mclennan J.
    Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26 (02) : 321 - 334
  • [4] On U.S. Energy Regulation
    Christensen, Adam
    Friedman, Peter
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 134 (07) : 40 - 41
  • [5] U.S. household energy consumption and intensity trends: A decomposition approach
    Hojjati, Behjat
    Wade, Steven H.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 : 304 - 314
  • [6] Analysis of iron and steel production paths on the energy demand and carbon emission in China’s iron and steel industry
    Qiang Yue
    Xicui Chai
    Yujie Zhang
    Qi Wang
    Heming Wang
    Feng Zhao
    Wei Ji
    Yuqi Lu
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 4065 - 4085
  • [7] Analysis of iron and steel production paths on the energy demand and carbon emission in China's iron and steel industry
    Yue, Qiang
    Chai, Xicui
    Zhang, Yujie
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Heming
    Zhao, Feng
    Ji, Wei
    Lu, Yuqi
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (05) : 4065 - 4085
  • [8] U.S. farms ready for major role in energy production
    Mazza, Patrick
    BioCycle, 2006, 47 (05) : 55 - 57
  • [9] An energy intensity optimization model for production system in iron and steel industry
    Lu, Biao
    Chen, Guang
    Chen, Demin
    Yu, Weiping
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 100 : 285 - 295
  • [10] Influence of the production fluctuation on the process energy intensity in iron and steel industry
    Chen, D.
    Lu, B.
    Chen, G.
    Yu, W.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 12 (01): : 75 - 87