Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery

被引:5
|
作者
Park, Bo Y. [1 ]
Cryer, Alica [2 ]
Betoni, James [2 ]
McLean, Lynn [2 ]
Figueroa, Heather [2 ]
Contag, Stephen A. [3 ]
Yao, Ruofan [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Publ Hlth, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 11234 Anderson St 3400, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
关键词
Induction of labor; trial of labor after cesarean delivery; vaginal birth after cesarean; INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN; VAGINAL BIRTH; WOMEN; POSTTERM; RUPTURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1807505
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The optimal timing of induction for those undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean section has not been established. The little data which supports the consideration of induction at 39 weeks gestation excludes those with a history of prior cesarean section. Objective To determine the risks and benefits of elective induction of labor (IOL) at 39 weeks compared with expectant management (EM) until 42 weeks in pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort analysis of singleton non-anomalous pregnancies in the United States between January 2015 and December 2017. Data was provided by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. Analyses included only pregnancies with a history of one previous cesarean delivery (CD). Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies electively induced at 39 weeks (IOL) were compared to pregnancies that were induced, augmented or underwent spontaneous labor between 40 and 42 weeks (EM). Unlabored cesarean deliveries were excluded. Outcomes of interest included: cesarean delivery, intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, adult intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, 5-minute Apgar score3, prolonged neonatal ventilation, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission, neonatal seizure, perinatal/neonatal death. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) for each outcome of interest, adjusting for confounding variables. Results There were 50,136 pregnancies included for analysis with 9,381 women in the IOL group. Compared with EM, IOL at 39 weeks decreased the risk of intra-amniotic infection (1.7% vs 3.0%,p < .001; aRR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.49-0.68]), blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 0.5%,p = .03; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.45-0.98]), and low 5-minute Apgar score (0.31% vs 0.47%,p = .031; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.44-0.97]). Conversely, IOL increased the risk of cesarean delivery (49.0% vs 27.6%,p < .001; aRR: 1.72, 95% CI: [1.68-1.77]). Furthermore, in the EM group, 919 pregnancies developed preeclampsia and 42 progressed to eclampsia. There were no differences in other perinatal outcomes. Conclusion In pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery, elective induction of labor at 39 weeks reduced the risk of intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, and low 5-minute Apgar score while increased the risk of repeat cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:2853 / 2858
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery
    Kaplan, DL
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16): : 1718 - 1719
  • [22] Induction of labor at 39 weeks and risk of cesarean delivery among obese women: a retrospective propensity score matched study
    Eberle, Alexa
    Czuzoj-Shulman, Nicholas
    Azoulay, Laurent
    Abenhaim, Haim Arie
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (07) : 791 - 796
  • [23] Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: Predictors of vaginal delivery
    Grinstead, J
    Grobman, WA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03): : 534 - 538
  • [24] Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery
    Palatnik, Anna
    Grobman, William A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 358.e1 - 358.e6
  • [25] Induction of Labor and Cesarean Delivery
    Grobman, William A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (09): : 880 - 881
  • [26] Factors associated with cesarean delivery following labor induction in pregnancies with preterm preeclampsia
    Price, Corley Rachelle
    Cornwall, Janae
    Daniel, Jeannez
    Chan, Melissa
    Chrieki, Sarah
    Vilchez, Gustavo
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Duncan, Jose R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S292 - S292
  • [27] Prior cesarean: A contraindication to labor induction?
    Mauldin, Jill G.
    Newman, Roger B.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03): : 684 - 697
  • [28] Outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery - Reply
    Landon, MB
    Leindecker, S
    Spong, CY
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16): : 1720 - 1720
  • [29] Outcomes of induction of labor after prior cesarean versus expectant management
    Palatnik, Anna
    Grobman, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S26 - S26
  • [30] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks in Low-Risk Term Pregnancies and Risk of Perinatal Death
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Czuzoj-Shulman, Nicholas
    Benjamin, Alice
    Spence, Andrea
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 76S - 76S