Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery

被引:5
|
作者
Park, Bo Y. [1 ]
Cryer, Alica [2 ]
Betoni, James [2 ]
McLean, Lynn [2 ]
Figueroa, Heather [2 ]
Contag, Stephen A. [3 ]
Yao, Ruofan [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Publ Hlth, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 11234 Anderson St 3400, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
关键词
Induction of labor; trial of labor after cesarean delivery; vaginal birth after cesarean; INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN; VAGINAL BIRTH; WOMEN; POSTTERM; RUPTURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1807505
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The optimal timing of induction for those undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean section has not been established. The little data which supports the consideration of induction at 39 weeks gestation excludes those with a history of prior cesarean section. Objective To determine the risks and benefits of elective induction of labor (IOL) at 39 weeks compared with expectant management (EM) until 42 weeks in pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort analysis of singleton non-anomalous pregnancies in the United States between January 2015 and December 2017. Data was provided by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. Analyses included only pregnancies with a history of one previous cesarean delivery (CD). Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies electively induced at 39 weeks (IOL) were compared to pregnancies that were induced, augmented or underwent spontaneous labor between 40 and 42 weeks (EM). Unlabored cesarean deliveries were excluded. Outcomes of interest included: cesarean delivery, intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, adult intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, 5-minute Apgar score3, prolonged neonatal ventilation, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission, neonatal seizure, perinatal/neonatal death. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) for each outcome of interest, adjusting for confounding variables. Results There were 50,136 pregnancies included for analysis with 9,381 women in the IOL group. Compared with EM, IOL at 39 weeks decreased the risk of intra-amniotic infection (1.7% vs 3.0%,p < .001; aRR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.49-0.68]), blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 0.5%,p = .03; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.45-0.98]), and low 5-minute Apgar score (0.31% vs 0.47%,p = .031; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.44-0.97]). Conversely, IOL increased the risk of cesarean delivery (49.0% vs 27.6%,p < .001; aRR: 1.72, 95% CI: [1.68-1.77]). Furthermore, in the EM group, 919 pregnancies developed preeclampsia and 42 progressed to eclampsia. There were no differences in other perinatal outcomes. Conclusion In pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery, elective induction of labor at 39 weeks reduced the risk of intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, and low 5-minute Apgar score while increased the risk of repeat cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:2853 / 2858
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Labor induction and the risk of cesarean delivery among term pregnancies
    Zandvakili, Farnazeh
    Shahoei, Roonak
    Roshani, Daem
    Nasab, Lila Hashemi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 5 (10): : 128 - 133
  • [12] Is Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Linked to Adverse Outcomes?
    Nelson, Roxanne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2019, 119 (02) : 16 - 17
  • [13] Methods of induction of labor after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery-Perinatal outcomes
    Levin, Gabriel
    Tsur, Abraham
    Burke, Yechiel Z.
    Meyer, Raanan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (02) : 612 - 619
  • [14] Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean
    Grobman, William A.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02): : 262 - 269
  • [15] Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in individuals with a prior cesarean birth who undergo induction at 39 weeks
    Uwanaka, Ogechukwu
    Raker, Christina
    Gupta, Megha
    Bicocca, Matthew J.
    Bartal, Michal Fishel
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Wagner, Stephen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 268 : 12 - 17
  • [16] Elective Induction of Labor Prior to 39 Weeks Initiating a Change in Culture
    Tillett, Jackie
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2012, 26 (03) : 190 - 192
  • [17] Induction of labor after prior cesarean delivery: A reasonable option?
    Sentilhes, L.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2009, 37 (05): : 452 - 453
  • [18] Does maternal age moderate the relationship between elective induction of labor at 39 weeks and primary cesarean delivery?
    Darney, Blair
    Snowden, Jonathan
    Dublin, Sascha
    Nicholson, James
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Getahun, Darios
    Cheng, Yvonne
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S313 - S314
  • [19] Elective induction of trial of labor after cesarean at 39 weeks: is it risk reducing?
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Macones, George A.
    Stout, Molly J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S525 - S526
  • [20] Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Abiad, May
    Grobman, William A.
    Mosesso, Kelly M.
    Daggy, Joanne K.
    Javinani, Ali
    Khalil, Asma
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Landon, Mark B.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (03): : 325 - 334