Managing soil-water and chemical transport with subsurface flow barriers

被引:5
|
作者
Kiuchi, M
Kaspar, TC
Horton, R
机构
[1] IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL, DEPT AGRON, AMES, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, NATL SOIL TILTH LAB, AMES, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030029x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Subsurface water-pow barriers have the potential for reducing NO3-N leaching and may improve fertilizer-use efficiency in cropping systems. This concept was investigated in field lysimeters near Ames, IA, filled with Sparta loamy fine sand (sandy, mixed mesic Entic Hapludoll) in 1989 and 1990. Our objectives were to determine (i) the effects of subsurface water-how barriers on leaching losses of NO3-N and Cl- and on N uptake by corn plants, and (ii) the effects of an absorbent (vermiculite) on the leaching of NO3-N and Cl-. Subsurface water-how barrier treatments were: no barrier (NB), a polyethylene sheet placed above the banded chemicals (PA), a polyethylene sheet placed below the band (PB), and a compacted soil layer formed in situ above the chemicals (CL). In 1989 with corn (Zea mays L.) plants growing in the lysimeters, subsurface barriers delayed and reduced leaching and increased plant N uptake compared with NE. The PA treatment was the most effective, reducing Cl- and NO3-N leaching by 24 and 21%, respectively, and doubling total N in corn shoots compared with NE. The CL treatment reduced anion leaching by 12%, but did not affect total plant N. In 1990, the subsurface barrier treatments were combined with two application methods, solution banding (S) and solution-vermiculite mixture banding (V). Averaged across barrier types, V banding delayed initial breakthrough of Cl- and NO3-N by 1.5 and 2.5 mm, respectively, and reduced the peak anion concentrations by an average of 25% compared with the S banding.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 887
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] TILLAGE AND SOIL-WATER
    OLSON, TC
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PUBLICATION, 1977, (NNC-5): : 13 - 18
  • [43] SOIL-WATER IN A FRAGIAQUALF
    SCOTTER, DR
    CLOTHIER, BE
    CORKER, RB
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1979, 17 (03): : 443 - 453
  • [44] Soil-Water Stress
    Varallyay, Gy.
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 37 (02) : 315 - 319
  • [45] PHYSICS OF SOIL-WATER
    WARRICK, AW
    ECOLOGY, 1975, 56 (02) : 505 - 506
  • [46] Effects of initial water content and irrigation frequency on soil-water dynamics under subsurface drip irrigation
    Shen, Zhenzhong
    Ren, Jie
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Cu, Weimin
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 9 (02): : 666 - 671
  • [47] NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF SOIL-WATER FLOW DURING WETTING IN A NONHOMOGENEOUS SOIL.
    Higuchi, Masao
    Journal of Hydrology, 1984, 74 (3-4) : 323 - 334
  • [48] Scour of soil with dynamics interactions among soil-water induced by jet flow
    Matsuda, T.
    Maeda, K.
    Yamaguchi, A.
    SCOUR AND EROSION, 2016, : 993 - 997
  • [49] Soil-Water Interactions
    Schaumann, Gabriele E.
    Bertmer, Marko
    EMAGRES, 2013, 2 (04): : 493 - 502
  • [50] DYNAMICS OF SOIL-WATER
    CHENG, BT
    AGROCHIMICA, 1974, 18 (03): : 240 - 252