Managing soil-water and chemical transport with subsurface flow barriers

被引:5
|
作者
Kiuchi, M
Kaspar, TC
Horton, R
机构
[1] IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL, DEPT AGRON, AMES, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, NATL SOIL TILTH LAB, AMES, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030029x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Subsurface water-pow barriers have the potential for reducing NO3-N leaching and may improve fertilizer-use efficiency in cropping systems. This concept was investigated in field lysimeters near Ames, IA, filled with Sparta loamy fine sand (sandy, mixed mesic Entic Hapludoll) in 1989 and 1990. Our objectives were to determine (i) the effects of subsurface water-how barriers on leaching losses of NO3-N and Cl- and on N uptake by corn plants, and (ii) the effects of an absorbent (vermiculite) on the leaching of NO3-N and Cl-. Subsurface water-how barrier treatments were: no barrier (NB), a polyethylene sheet placed above the banded chemicals (PA), a polyethylene sheet placed below the band (PB), and a compacted soil layer formed in situ above the chemicals (CL). In 1989 with corn (Zea mays L.) plants growing in the lysimeters, subsurface barriers delayed and reduced leaching and increased plant N uptake compared with NE. The PA treatment was the most effective, reducing Cl- and NO3-N leaching by 24 and 21%, respectively, and doubling total N in corn shoots compared with NE. The CL treatment reduced anion leaching by 12%, but did not affect total plant N. In 1990, the subsurface barrier treatments were combined with two application methods, solution banding (S) and solution-vermiculite mixture banding (V). Averaged across barrier types, V banding delayed initial breakthrough of Cl- and NO3-N by 1.5 and 2.5 mm, respectively, and reduced the peak anion concentrations by an average of 25% compared with the S banding.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 887
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sorption and transport of trenbolone and altrenogest photoproducts in soil-water systems
    Yang, Xingjian
    Zhao, Haoqi
    Cwiertny, David M.
    Kolodziej, Edward P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (10) : 1650 - 1663
  • [32] A NUMERICAL TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING TRANSIENT FLOW OF WATER TO A SOIL-WATER SAMPLER
    NARASIMHAN, TN
    DREISS, SJ
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 141 (03) : 230 - 236
  • [33] THE REGULATION OF SOIL-WATER IN POTS BY MEANS OF CONTROLLING THE SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL
    DURR, HJ
    VANASSCHE, F
    SCHWARZ, M
    LAKER, MC
    SOMMER, C
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE, 1992, 42 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [34] Transport behavior of microplastics in soil-water environments and its dependence on soil components
    Xu, Liheng
    Wang, Yuhao
    Wei, Fang
    Dai, Zhixi
    Zhang, Ming
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 346
  • [36] THERMODYNAMICS OF SOIL-WATER .1. ENERGY CONCEPT OF SOIL-WATER
    IWATA, S
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1972, 113 (03) : 162 - &
  • [37] BEHAVIOR OF THE INSECTICIDES ETHOPROPHOS AND CARBOFURAN DURING SOIL-WATER TRANSPORT
    DOWLING, KC
    COSTELLA, RG
    LEMLEY, AT
    PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1994, 41 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [38] LEACHING CHARACTERISTICS OF REPACKED SOIL COLUMNS AS INFLUENCED BY SUBSURFACE FLOW BARRIERS
    KIUCHI, M
    HORTON, R
    KASPAR, TC
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (04) : 1212 - 1218
  • [39] Soil-water bypass
    Fred M. Phillips
    Nature Geoscience, 2010, 3 : 77 - 78
  • [40] Simulating water flow to a subsurface drain in a layered soil
    Öztekin, Tekin
    2002, TUBITAK (26)