Managing soil-water and chemical transport with subsurface flow barriers

被引:5
|
作者
Kiuchi, M
Kaspar, TC
Horton, R
机构
[1] IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL, DEPT AGRON, AMES, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, NATL SOIL TILTH LAB, AMES, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030029x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Subsurface water-pow barriers have the potential for reducing NO3-N leaching and may improve fertilizer-use efficiency in cropping systems. This concept was investigated in field lysimeters near Ames, IA, filled with Sparta loamy fine sand (sandy, mixed mesic Entic Hapludoll) in 1989 and 1990. Our objectives were to determine (i) the effects of subsurface water-how barriers on leaching losses of NO3-N and Cl- and on N uptake by corn plants, and (ii) the effects of an absorbent (vermiculite) on the leaching of NO3-N and Cl-. Subsurface water-how barrier treatments were: no barrier (NB), a polyethylene sheet placed above the banded chemicals (PA), a polyethylene sheet placed below the band (PB), and a compacted soil layer formed in situ above the chemicals (CL). In 1989 with corn (Zea mays L.) plants growing in the lysimeters, subsurface barriers delayed and reduced leaching and increased plant N uptake compared with NE. The PA treatment was the most effective, reducing Cl- and NO3-N leaching by 24 and 21%, respectively, and doubling total N in corn shoots compared with NE. The CL treatment reduced anion leaching by 12%, but did not affect total plant N. In 1990, the subsurface barrier treatments were combined with two application methods, solution banding (S) and solution-vermiculite mixture banding (V). Averaged across barrier types, V banding delayed initial breakthrough of Cl- and NO3-N by 1.5 and 2.5 mm, respectively, and reduced the peak anion concentrations by an average of 25% compared with the S banding.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 887
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRANSPORT OF BACTERIA DURING UNSTEADY UNSATURATED SOIL-WATER FLOW
    TAN, Y
    BOND, WJ
    GRIFFIN, DM
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (05) : 1331 - 1340
  • [2] THERMODYNAMICS OF SOIL-WATER .4. CHEMICAL POTENTIAL OF SOIL-WATER
    IWATA, S
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 117 (03) : 135 - 139
  • [3] UNSATURATED SOIL-WATER FLOW
    SMITH, RE
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1983, 21 (03) : 755 - 760
  • [4] Surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow as a response to conservation tillage and soil-water conditions
    Bosch, D.D.
    Potter, T.L.
    Truman, C.C.
    Bednarz, C.W.
    Strickland, T.C.
    Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48 (06): : 2137 - 2144
  • [5] Surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow as a response to conservation tillage and soil-water conditions
    Bosch, DD
    Potter, TL
    Truman, CC
    Bednarz, CW
    Strickland, TC
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2005, 48 (06): : 2137 - 2144
  • [6] A PROBE METHOD FOR SOIL-WATER SAMPLING AND SUBSURFACE MEASUREMENTS
    HARRISON, WD
    OSTERKAMP, TE
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (06) : 1731 - 1736
  • [7] Studies of soil-water transport by MRI
    Amin, MHG
    Richards, KS
    Chorley, RJ
    Gibbs, SJ
    Carpenter, TA
    Hall, LD
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (7-8) : 879 - 882
  • [8] A threshold condition for soil-water transport
    Torres, R
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (13) : 2703 - 2706
  • [9] Sensitivity of a soil-water flow model
    Kettunen, J.
    Paasonen-Kivekaes, M.
    Karvonen, T.
    Aqua Fennica, 1992, 22 (02): : 91 - 103
  • [10] SOLUTE TRANSPORT DURING UNSTEADY, UNSATURATED SOIL-WATER FLOW - THE PULSE INPUT
    BOND, WJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1987, 25 (03): : 223 - 241