The GLID method: Moving from design features to underlying values in co-design

被引:24
|
作者
Van Mechelen, Maarten [1 ,2 ]
Derboven, Jan [1 ]
Laenen, Ann [3 ]
Willems, Bert [2 ,4 ]
Geerts, David [1 ]
Abeele, Vero Vanden [5 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, iMinds, Meaningful Interact Lab, Parkstr 45 Box 3605, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] PXL Univ Coll, PXL MAD, Elfde Liniestr 24, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
[3] Univ Malta, Dept Digital Arts, Msida 2080, Msd, Malta
[4] Hasselt Univ, Fac Architecture & Arts, Agoralaan,Bldg D, B-2590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[5] IW Leuven, E Medialab, Vesaliusstr 13, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Participatory design; Co-design; Values; Multimodal analysis; Means-end theory; Design methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.005
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present the GLID method to integrate verbal, material and other co-design outcomes in a structured and coherent analysis. GLID aims to increase internal rigor and transparency in Participatory Design practices and wants to go beyond the surface level of ideas, by identifying participants' values embedded in co-design outcomes. We discuss GLID's theoretical groundings in multimodality and a values-led approach to Participatory Design, and present a case study with primary school children. This case study demonstrates how the different stages of the GLID method can be applied in practice. Based on the case study, we reflect on how GLID contributes to a holistic, situated and more empathic understanding in co-design practices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 128
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-design goes large
    Avram G.
    Ciolfi L.
    Spedale S.
    Roberts D.
    Petrelli D.
    Interactions (N.Y.), 2019, 26 (05): : 59 - 63
  • [32] Innovative Labs and Co-design
    Duarte, F.
    Beguin, P.
    Pueyo, V.
    Lima, F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA 2018), VOL VII: ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, DESIGN FOR ALL, ACTIVITY THEORIES FOR WORK ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, AFFECTIVE DESIGN, 2019, 824 : 1967 - 1971
  • [33] A behavioral model for co-design
    He, JF
    FM'99-FORMAL METHODS, VOL II, 1999, 1709 : 1420 - 1438
  • [34] Temporal Refinement in Co-Design
    Aljer, Ammar
    Boulanger, Jean-Louis
    Devienne, Philippe
    2008 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: FROM THEORY TO APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1587 - +
  • [35] Analog/Digital Co-Design
    Heuschen, F
    Waldschmidt, K
    ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN OF DISTRIBUTED EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, 2001, 61 : 23 - 32
  • [36] eService co-design platforms
    Forsgren, O
    EADOPTION AND THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY: ISSUES, APPLICATIONS, CASE STUDIES, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 1 : 862 - 868
  • [37] Co-design for community inclusion
    Crates, N.
    Hawkins, C.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 653 - 653
  • [38] Speculative Co-Design of Robots
    Van den Bergh, Victor
    Robert, David
    Zilberman, Nadezhda
    WHAT SOCIAL ROBOTS CAN AND SHOULD DO, 2016, 290 : 252 - 254
  • [39] The ethics of co-design: a commentary
    Barson, Leslie
    JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, 2024, 29 (01) : 30 - 31
  • [40] Resourcing of Experience in Co-Design
    Ylirisku, Salu
    Revsbaek, Line
    Buur, Jacob
    ANALYSING DESIGN THINKING: STUDIES OF CROSS-CULTURAL CO-CREATION, 2017, : 59 - 75