Working alliance development in occupational therapy: A cross-case analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Morrison, Tricia L. [1 ]
Smith, J. David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Educ, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
关键词
professional-patient relations; therapeutic processes; PARTNERSHIPS;
D O I
10.1111/1440-1630.12053
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite reverence afforded the therapeutic relationship construct in occupational therapy, many occupational therapists feel ill equipped to use themselves therapeutically to enhance the relationship with their clients. Furthermore, although occupational therapists often link the strength of the therapeutic relationship to therapy outcomes, related occupational therapy specific research has been limited. According to the psychotherapy literature, the working alliance is one element of the therapeutic relationship which has in fact been linked to therapy outcomes. MethodsA mixed-methods, prospective, multiple case study approach was used to compare the experiences of the working alliance by both occupational therapists and clients across four therapeutic dyads. ResultsSeveral key elements were identified in this study's qualitative data as shaping the process of alliance development in occupational therapy including: the fostering of an interpersonal connection; the use of humour as therapeutic modality; an impetus to act that leads to functional enhancements; a shared sense of success and a positive feedback mechanism created through successfully attaining clearly delineated, client-centred therapy goals. ConclusionsBy considering these identified elements, occupational therapists may focus upon tangible considerations towards enhanced therapeutic use-of-self in the development of sound working alliance with their clients potentially improving therapy outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 333
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What matters in learning communities for inclusive education: a cross-case analysis
    Walton, Elizabeth
    Carrington, Suzanne
    Saggers, Beth
    Edwards, Chris
    Kimani, Wacango
    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2022, 48 (01) : 134 - 148
  • [42] Exploring response levels to sustainability in engineering curricula: a cross-case analysis
    Gutierrez-Bucheli, Laura
    Reid, Alan
    Kidman, Gillian
    Lamborn, Julia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [43] The multi-variation approach: Cross-case analysis of ethnographic fieldwork
    Hasse C.
    Paladyn, 2019, 10 (01): : 219 - 227
  • [44] The process of developing and implementing criteria for sustainable agriculture: A cross-case analysis
    Binnekamp, Menno
    Ingenbleek, Paul
    Goddijn, Silvia
    ETHICS AND THE POLITICS OF FOOD, 2006, : 239 - +
  • [45] Multiplying the use of space and what it implies in practice: a cross-case analysis
    Brinkoe, Rikke
    Nielsen, Susanne Balslev
    JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (02) : 197 - 216
  • [46] Differences and similarities in the development of Professional Learning Communities: A cross-case longitudinal study
    Huijboom, Fred
    van Meeuwen, Pierre
    Rusman, Ellen
    Vermeulen, Marjan
    LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2023, 42
  • [47] Occupational therapy and rehabilitation: An awkward alliance
    Friedland, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1998, 52 (05): : 373 - 380
  • [48] A Perspective on Human Factors Contributing to Quality Requirements: a Cross-case Analysis
    Marnewick, Annlize
    Pretorius, Jan-Harm
    Pretorius, Leon
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 389 - 393
  • [49] Implementation of interprofessional team-based care: A cross-case analysis
    Sibbald, Shannon L.
    Ziegler, Bianca R.
    Maskell, Rachelle
    Schouten, Karen
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2021, 35 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [50] ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORKING ALLIANCE USING HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELING
    KIVLIGHAN, DM
    SHAUGHNESSY, P
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 42 (03) : 338 - 349