An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078
    Goorhuis, Abraham
    Bakker, Dennis
    Corver, Jeroen
    Debast, Sylvia B.
    Harmanus, Celine
    Notermans, Daan W.
    Bergwerff, Aldert A.
    Dekker, Frido W.
    Kuijper, Ed J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 47 (09) : 1162 - 1170
  • [32] Diagnosis and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in an island population
    Kumar, Shankar
    Pollok, Richard
    Muscat, Ivan
    Planche, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (02) : 415 - 419
  • [33] Real-time polymerase chain reaction correlates well with clinical diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Berry, N.
    Sewell, B.
    Jafri, S.
    Puli, C.
    Vagia, S.
    Lewis, A. M.
    Davies, D.
    Rees, E.
    Ch'ng, C. L.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2014, 87 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [34] Missed diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection; a prospective evaluation of unselected stool samples
    Reigadas, E.
    Alcala, L.
    Marin, M.
    Burillo, A.
    Munoz, P.
    Bouza, E.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2015, 70 (03) : 264 - 272
  • [35] STOOL TRANSPLANTATION FOR OLDER PATIENTS WITH Clostridium difficile INFECTION
    Rubin, Timothy A.
    Gessert, Charles E.
    Aas, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2009, 57 (12) : 2386 - 2387
  • [36] Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile Infection Diagnosed by Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Cheng, Ying
    Du, Pengcheng
    Chen, Chen
    Yan, Shengkai
    Jia, Hongbing
    Wang, Jing
    Yan, Qirong
    Feng, Hanping
    Lu, Jinxing
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (05): : 520 - 522
  • [37] RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    WREN, B
    CLAYTON, C
    TABAQCHALI, S
    LANCET, 1990, 335 (8686): : 423 - 423
  • [38] DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTIONS WITH THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    KUHL, SJ
    TANG, YJ
    NAVARRO, L
    GUMERLOCK, PH
    SILVA, J
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 16 : S234 - S238
  • [39] Laboratory Testing of Donors and Stool Samples for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection
    Woodworth, Michael H.
    Neish, Emma M.
    Miller, Nancy S.
    Dhere, Tanvi
    Burd, Eileen M.
    Carpentieri, Cynthia
    Sitchenko, Kaitlin L.
    Kraft, Colleen S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (04) : 1002 - 1010
  • [40] Evaluation of a commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of environmental contamination with Clostridium difficile
    Deshpande, A.
    Kundrapu, S.
    Sunkesula, V. C. K.
    Cadnum, J. L.
    Fertelli, D.
    Donskey, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2013, 85 (01) : 76 - 78