An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ADHERENCE TO THE TESTING GUIDELINES FOR CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE TOXIN IN STOOL IMPROVED THE RATES OF HOSPITAL ACQUIRED CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION
    Elkafrawy, Ahmed A.
    Saeed, Lyla
    Tomaw, Andrew
    Numan, Laith
    Boyd, Sarah
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S894 - S894
  • [22] Rapid and accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Song, Pil Hun
    Min, Jung Hwa
    Kim, You Sun
    Jo, Soo Yeon
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Lee, Kyung Jin
    Lee, Jeonghun
    Sung, Hyun
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    Whang, Dong Hee
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [23] Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection
    Krutova, Marcela
    Briksi, Ales
    Tkadlec, Jan
    Zajac, Miroslav
    Matejkova, Jana
    Nyc, Otakar
    Drevinek, Pavel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (10)
  • [24] Detection of toxigenic clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C-difficile -: Associated diarrhea
    Peterson, Lance R.
    Manson, Rebecca U.
    Paule, Suzanne M.
    Hacek, Donna M.
    Robicsek, Ari
    Thomson, Richard B.
    Kaul, Karen L.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 (09) : 1152 - 1160
  • [25] Stool transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
    Rosien, U.
    Hagel, S.
    Goetz, M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2015, 10 (02): : 122 - 126
  • [26] Impact of toxigenic Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction testing on the clinical microbiology laboratory and inpatient epidemiology
    Napierala, Maureen
    Munson, Erik
    Skonieczny, Patrice
    Rodriguez, Sonia
    Riederer, Nancy
    Land, Gayle
    Luzinski, Mary
    Block, Denise
    Hryciuk, Jeanne E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 76 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [27] IDENTIFICATION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    KATO, N
    OU, CY
    KATO, H
    BARTLEY, SL
    BROWN, VK
    DOWELL, VR
    UENO, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [28] Polymerase chain reaction ribotypes of Clostridium difficile in hospitals in England and Wales
    Brazier, JS
    O'Neill, GL
    Duerden, BI
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 8 : S55 - S56
  • [29] The Impact of Polymerase Chain Reaction on Clostridium difficile Detection and Clinical Outcomes
    Akbari, Mona
    Novack, Victor
    Kelly, Ciaran P.
    Leffler, Daniel A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S726 - S727
  • [30] Detection of Clostridium difficile by polymerase chain reaction in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Balamurugan, R.
    Ramakrishna, Balakrishnan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 : A495 - A495