An Evaluation of Repeat Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction

被引:25
|
作者
Khanna, Sahil [1 ]
Pardi, Darrell S. [1 ]
Rosenblatt, Jon E. [4 ]
Patel, Robin [2 ,3 ]
Kammer, Patricia P. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory testing; screening efficacy; CULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; DIARRHEA; GUIDELINES; COLITIS; SOCIETY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Goals: To evaluate the yield of repeat stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Background: CDI is a major challenge in health care due to its frequent occurrence and high associated costs. Enzyme immunoassay and PCR are commonly performed diagnostic tests for CDI. Methods: Our microbiology laboratory database was queried from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 for all patients who underwent PCR stool testing for suspected CDI. Data collected included age, sex, number of stool tests performed within a 14-day period after the first test, and location of patient (inpatient vs. outpatient). Analyses were performed using JMP version 9.0.1. Results: PCR testing was performed in 15,515 patients. The median age was 58.3 years (range, 10 d to 104.3 y) and 46.2% of patients were women. Repeat testing was infrequent; 87.3% of patients had testing performed only once in a 14-day period. Increased age, male sex, and inpatient location were predictors of repeat testing. The median time between an initial test and the first repeat test was 5 days. After an initial negative test, the percentage of patients having a subsequent positive test was low (2.7% in 7 d and 3.2% in 14 d). The percentage of repeat tests that was positive within 7 days (2.9%) was lower than the percentage that was positive from day 8 to day 14 (4.8%, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Repeat testing for C. difficile has a low yield, and patients with an initial negative test should not routinely be retested.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 849
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Evaluation of Repeat Polymerase Chain Reaction Stool Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection 2011 ACG Presidential Poster
    Khanna, Sahil
    Kammer, Patricia
    Rosenblatt, Jon
    Baddour, Larry
    Pardi, Darrell
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S145 - S145
  • [2] Polymerase chain reaction testing for Clostridium difficile
    Catanzaro, Mary
    Cirone, Justin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (06) : 580 - 581
  • [3] Kinetics of Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection
    Khanna, Sahil
    Mrazek, Matthew
    Kammer, Patricia
    Patel, Robin
    Pardi, Darrell
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S175 - S175
  • [4] Value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile
    Glasheen, Jeffrey J.
    Carter, Jeffrey E.
    Prochazka, Allan V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 120 (07): : E11 - E11
  • [5] Value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile -: Reply
    Mohan, Sowjanya S.
    McDermott, Brian P.
    Parchuri, Subha
    Cunha, Burke A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 120 (07): : E13 - E13
  • [6] Value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxins
    Zhang, Linsheng
    Steed, Lisa L.
    Nolle, Frclcrick S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 130 (03) : 473 - 474
  • [7] DETECTION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE IN STOOL SPECIMENS BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    KATO, N
    OU, CY
    KATO, H
    BARTLEY, SL
    LUO, CC
    KILLGORE, GE
    UENO, K
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 167 (02): : 455 - 458
  • [8] Lack of value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxin
    Mohan, SS
    McDermott, BP
    Parchuri, S
    Cunha, BA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (04): : 356.e7 - 356.e8
  • [9] Impact of polymerase chain reaction testing on Clostridium difficile infection rates in an acute health care facility
    Murad, Yanal M.
    Perez, Justo
    Nokhbeh, Reza
    Ybazeta, Gustavo
    Dewar, Brenda
    Lefebvre, Sebastien
    Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2015, 43 (04) : 383 - 386
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy of Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Detection of Clostridium difficile in the Stool Samples of Patients With Suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: A Meta-Analysis
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Pasupuleti, Vinay
    Rolston, David D. K.
    Jain, Anil
    Deshpande, Narayan
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 53 (07) : E81 - E90