Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Building Components towards NZEBs

被引:5
|
作者
Antypa, Despoina [1 ]
Petrakli, Foteini [1 ]
Gkika, Anastasia [1 ]
Voigt, Pamela [2 ]
Kahnt, Alexander [2 ]
Boehm, Robert [2 ]
Suchorzewski, Jan [3 ]
Araujo, Andreia [4 ,5 ]
Sousa, Susana [4 ,5 ]
Koumoulos, Elias P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRES Innovat Res & Engn Solut, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, B-1780 Wemmel, Belgium
[2] Leipzig Univ Appl Sci HTWK Leipzig, Inst Concrete Construction, Fac Civil Engn, PF 30 11 66, D-04251 Leipzig, Germany
[3] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Brinellgatan 4, S-50115 Boras, Sweden
[4] INEGI Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[5] LAETA Associated Lab Energy Transports & Aeronaut, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; sustainability; building components; thermal insulation; NZEB; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su142316218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The building sector accounts for 40% of the total energy consumed in Europe at annual basis, together with the relevant Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. In order to mitigate these impacts, the concept and establishment of the Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) is under continuous and intensive research. In fact, as the energy used for buildings' operation becomes more efficient, impacts resulting from the buildings' embodied energy become of more importance. Therefore, the selection of building materials and components is of high significance, as these affect the energy performance and potential environmental impacts of the building envelopes. The objective of this study is to perform a preliminary Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on advanced multifunctional building components, aiming to achieve lower embodied emissions in NZEBs. The advanced components analyzed are composite panels for facade elements of building envelopes, providing thermal efficiency. The design of sustainable building envelope systems is expected to upgrade the overall environmental performance of buildings, including the NZEBs. The findings of this study constitute unambiguous evidence on the need for further research on this topic, as substantial lack of data concerning embodied impacts is presented in literature, adding to the growing discussion on NZEBs at a whole life cycle perspective across Europe. This research has shown that the electricity required from the manufacturing phase of the examined building components is the main contributor to climate change impact and the other environmental categories assessed. Sensitivity analysis that has been performed indicated that the climate change impact is highly depended on the electricity grid energy mix across Europe. Taking into account the current green energy transition by the increase of the renewable energy sources in electricity production, as well as the future upgrade of the manufacturing processes, it is expected that this climate change impact will be mitigated. Finally, the comparison between the CLC thermal insulator and other foam concretes in literature showed that the materials of the building components examined do not present any diversions in terms of environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of traditional Saharan houses: Towards a sustainable building?
    Kaoula, Dalel
    Rahmani, Soumia
    Lemita, Ikhlas
    Zemirli, Mohamed Abdelmomen Ould
    Semahi, Samir
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 57
  • [2] Integration of Building Information Modelling and Life Cycle Assessment: Towards a Framework for Workflow
    Huang, Jieying J. Y.
    Lin, Han H.
    Chang, Ruidong R. D.
    Huang, Shuming S. M.
    2021 THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS-EUROPE, ICIEA 2021-EUROPE, 2021, : 104 - 108
  • [3] Overview on life cycle methodologies and economic feasibility for nZEBs
    Sesana, Marta Maria
    Salvalai, Graziano
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 67 : 211 - 216
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment for Building Envelope
    Bao, Dongjie
    Zhang, Wenxia
    Yang, Jiangbo
    APPLIED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 724-725 : 1643 - 1649
  • [5] A Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment (CE-LCA) model for building components
    van Stijn, A.
    Eberhardt, L. C. Malabi
    Jansen, B. Wouterszoon
    Meijer, A.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 174
  • [6] Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of a Living Building
    Gardner, Haley M.
    Hasik, Vaclav
    Banawi, Abdulaziz
    Olinzock, Maureen
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 26 (04)
  • [7] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):
  • [8] PERCEPTIONS OF A SME BUILDING SECTOR TOWARDS PROPOSALS FOR IMPROVEMENT BASED IN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Pacheco-Blanco, Belgica
    Collado-Ruiz, Daniel
    Vinoles-Cebolla, Rosario
    Dyna, 2014, 89 (05): : 518 - 525
  • [9] Towards the principles of life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrative review for the construction and building industry
    Dong, Yahong
    Ng, S. Thomas
    Liu, Peng
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 95
  • [10] The assessment of the relevance of building components and life phases for the environmental profile of nearly zero-energy buildings: life cycle assessment of a multifamily building in Italy
    Michele Paleari
    Monica Lavagna
    Andrea Campioli
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1667 - 1690