Algorithms and collaborative-care systems for depression: Are they effective and why? A systematic review

被引:94
|
作者
Adli, Mazda
Bauer, Michael
Rush, A. John
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Charite, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
关键词
treatment algorithms; antidepressants; treatment-resistant depression; collaborative care; medical decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems are systematic treatment approaches that are designed to improve outcomes by enhancing the quality of care. During the last decade. algorithm research has evolved as a new branch of clinical research that evaluates the clinical and economic impact of algorithm-guided treatment in primary and psychiatric care of patients with depressive disorders. Methods: This article discusses the rationale of algorithm development, their risks and limitations, and important elements in their implementation in clinical practice. It further reviews the available studies that have evaluated algorithm-guided treatment for depression. Results: Recent studies show that compared with treatment as usual, the use of algorithms and collaborative-care approaches in the care of depressed patients enhances treatment outcomes by modifying practice procedures and treatment processes. Conclusions: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems clearly increase the efficacy of applied treatments in the care of depressed patients. However, to what extent the enhanced outcomes are a result of diligent measurement-based care or of the specific treatment steps that are used remains to be resolved. Valid clinical or pharmacogenetic predictors of response are needed to further tailor specific algorithms to individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1038
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Review: collaborative care improves depression and anxiety symptoms in adults
    Bauer, Amy M.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) : 40 - 40
  • [42] Insights from Collaborative Care: A Review of the Evidence for Depression and Diabetes
    Lahijani, Sheila
    Rosenthal, Lisa J.
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2015, 45 (08) : 401 - 405
  • [43] Collaborative care for the treatment of comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Tully P.J.
    Baumeister H.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [44] Participatory and Collaborative Modeling of Sustainable Systems: A Systematic Review
    Manellanga, Rajitha
    David, Istvan
    ACM/IEEE 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS: COMPANION PROCEEDINGS, MODELS 2024, 2024, : 645 - 654
  • [45] Updating Wound Care Algorithms: A Systematic, Focused Review
    van Rijswijk, Lia
    Beitz, Janice M.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2025, 52 (02) : 104 - 111
  • [46] Effective Treatments of Late-Life Depression in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review
    Yoon, Seokwon
    Moon, Sung Seek
    Pitner, Ronald
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (02) : 116 - 130
  • [47] Overuse and Systems of Care A Systematic Review
    Keyhani, Salomeh
    Falk, Raphael
    Howell, Elizabeth A.
    Bishop, Tara
    Korenstein, Deborah
    MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (06) : 503 - 508
  • [48] Evidence of cost-effective treatments for depression: a systematic review
    Barrett, B
    Byford, S
    Knapp, M
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2005, 84 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [49] Is group psychotherapy effective in older adults with depression? A systematic review
    Krishna, Murali
    Jauhari, Archana
    Lepping, Peter
    Turner, Jim
    Crossley, David
    Krishnamoorthy, Ashok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26 (04) : 331 - 340
  • [50] Brief interventions for depression in primary care A systematic review
    McNaughton, Jennifer L.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2009, 55 (08) : 789 - 796