Algorithms and collaborative-care systems for depression: Are they effective and why? A systematic review

被引:94
|
作者
Adli, Mazda
Bauer, Michael
Rush, A. John
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Charite, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
关键词
treatment algorithms; antidepressants; treatment-resistant depression; collaborative care; medical decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems are systematic treatment approaches that are designed to improve outcomes by enhancing the quality of care. During the last decade. algorithm research has evolved as a new branch of clinical research that evaluates the clinical and economic impact of algorithm-guided treatment in primary and psychiatric care of patients with depressive disorders. Methods: This article discusses the rationale of algorithm development, their risks and limitations, and important elements in their implementation in clinical practice. It further reviews the available studies that have evaluated algorithm-guided treatment for depression. Results: Recent studies show that compared with treatment as usual, the use of algorithms and collaborative-care approaches in the care of depressed patients enhances treatment outcomes by modifying practice procedures and treatment processes. Conclusions: Treatment algorithms and collaborative-care systems clearly increase the efficacy of applied treatments in the care of depressed patients. However, to what extent the enhanced outcomes are a result of diligent measurement-based care or of the specific treatment steps that are used remains to be resolved. Valid clinical or pharmacogenetic predictors of response are needed to further tailor specific algorithms to individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1038
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collaborative care for depression in general practice: overview of systematic reviews
    Minozzi, S.
    Tibaldi, G.
    Parmelli, E.
    Pistotti, V.
    Ferrannini, L.
    Munizza, C.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2011, 20 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [32] Collaborative Indoor Positioning Systems: A Systematic Review
    Pascacio, Pavel
    Casteleyn, Sven
    Torres-Sospedra, Joaquin
    Lohan, Elena Simona
    Nurmi, Jari
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (03) : 1 - 39
  • [33] Requirements Elicitation for Collaborative Systems: A Systematic Review
    Canche, Maximiliano
    Pino, Jose A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN (CSCWD), 2021, : 297 - 304
  • [34] Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression and HbA1c in Patients with Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Yanshang
    Hu, Mingzheng
    Zhu, Dawei
    Ding, Ruoxi
    He, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22 (03):
  • [35] Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for depression and HbA1c in patients with depression and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yanshang
    Hu, Mingzheng
    Zhu, Dawei
    Ding, Ruoxi
    He, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [36] Collaborative care for depression - Is effective in older people, as the IMPACT trial shows
    Simon, G
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7536): : 249 - 250
  • [38] Characteristics of effective teletherapy for major depression: A systematic review
    Crowe, Marie
    Inder, Maree
    Manuel, Jenni
    Carlyle, Dave
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 327 : 175 - 182
  • [39] Best Practices for Systematic Case Review in Collaborative Care
    Bauer, Amy M.
    Williams, Mark D.
    Ratzliff, Anna
    Unuetzer, Juergen
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2019, 70 (11) : 1064 - 1067
  • [40] The clinical effectiveness of stepped care systems for depression in working age adults: A systematic review
    Firth, Nick
    Barkham, Michael
    Kellett, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 170 : 119 - 130