On using 3D γ-analysis for IMRT and VMAT pretreatment plan QA

被引：37

作者：

Wu, Chuan ^{[1
]}

Hosier, Kelly E. ^{[1
]}

Beck, Kristen E. ^{[1
]}

Radevic, Marlyn B. ^{[1
]}

Lehmann, Joerg ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Hao H. ^{[2
]}

Kroner, Aaron ^{[1
]}

Dutton, Sharon C. ^{[1
]}

Rosenthal, Seth A. ^{[1
]}

Bareng, Jonathan K. ^{[1
]}

Logsdon, Mark D. ^{[1
]}

Asche, David R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] RAS, ROC, Sacramento, CA 95815 USA

[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Math, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA

来源：

MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2012年 / 39卷 / 06期

关键词：

IMRT; VMAT; 3D-Gamma; EPID; QA; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; DOSE RECONSTRUCTION; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; EPID DOSIMETRY; PASSING RATES; VERIFICATION; BEAM; ALGORITHM; IMAGES;

D O I：

10.1118/1.4711755

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Purpose: To investigate using 3D c analysis for IMRT and VMAT QA. Methods: We explored and studied 3D c-analysis by comparing TPS computed and EPID backprojection reconstructed doses in patient's CT images. Two 3D c quantities, cPTV and c10, were proposed and studied for evaluating the QA results, and compared to 2D c (MapCheck composite: cMC). Results: It was found that when 3%(global)= 3 mm criteria was used, all IMRT and 90% of VMAT plans passed QA with a c pass rate -90%. A significant statistical correlation was observed between 3D and 2D c-analysis results for IMRT QA if c10 and cMC are concerned, but no significant relation is found between cPTV and cMC. Conclusions: 3D c analysis based on EPID dose back-projection may provide a feasible tool for IMRT and VMAT pretreatment plan QA. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http:/dx.doi.org10.11181.4711755]

引用

页码：3051 / 3059

页数：9

共 50 条

[31] Comparison of plan quality and robustness using VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer
Yin, Chuou
Deng, Juan
Mei, Guojian
Cheng, Hao
He, Yingying
Liu, Jiang
OPEN PHYSICS, 2024, 22 (01):
[32] A quantative DVH study of the prostate IMRT plan versus the 3D conformal plan
Yang, CJ
Murphy, S
Chen, H
Raben, A
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 202 - 203
[33] A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA
O'Daniel, Jennifer C.
Giles, William
Cui, Yunfeng
Adamson, Justus
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (09) : 5387 - 5397
[34] Study of VMAT Plan QA Using Film, Diode Based, and Ion Chamber Based QA Systems
Cao, D.
Chen, F.
Rao, M.
Afghan, M.
Ye, J.
Shepard, D.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
[35] Pretreatment Patient Clinical Objective IMRT Quality Assurance Using a 3D Diode Array
Ren, L.
Zhang, Y.
Yang, Y.
Adamson, J.
Yin, F.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
[36] Comparison of conventional 3D RT for pelvis and sequential 3D boost plan for prostate versus IMRT plan for pelvis and sequential IMRT boost plan for prostate versus IMRT SIB (pelvis with prostate) versus IMRT SIB (pelvis with prostate) and sequential IMRT boost plan for prostate
Mazzarella, G.
Bonanni, A.
Leone, M.
Caspiani, O.
Guidi, C.
Petrone, A.
Bufacchi, A.
Tortoreto, F.
Malatesta, T.
Marmiroli, L.
EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 162 - 163
[37] Characterization of a 2D Array for QA and Pretreatment Plan Verification
Anvari, A.
Aghamiri, S.
Mahdavi, S.
Alaei, P.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 237 - +
[38] Whole IMRT, Hybrid IMRT and 3D Conformal Plan A Dosimetric Comparison for Large Target
Sharma, S.
Manigandan, D.
Gandhi, A.
Subramani, V.
Sharma, D.
Kumar, P.
Julka, P.
Rath, G.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3840 - 3841
[39] An investigation of PRESAGE® 3D dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT radiation therapy treatment verification
Jackson, Jake
Juang, Titania
Adamovics, John
Oldham, Mark
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (06): : 2217 - 2230
[40] Experimental Measurements of 3D Dose Distribution for a Moving Target Treated with IMRT and VMAT
Yan, H.
Thomas, A.
Oldham, M.
Yin, F.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3792 - 3792

← 1 2 3 4 5 →