COMPARISON OF 3T AND 1.5T BRAIN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT FOCAL EPILEPSY

被引：0
|
作者：
Ladino, L. D. [1 ]
Balaguera, P. [2 ]
Delgado, J. A. [3 ]
Tellez-Zenteno, J. F. [4 ]
Hernandez-Ronquillo, L. [4 ]
Llano, J. F. [3 ]
Rascovsky, S. J. [3 ]
Gomez-Arias, B. [5 ]
Arias, J. F. [5 ]
Bustamante, C. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, IATM, Epilepsy Res, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Medellin Clin, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Epilepsy Res, IATM, Medellin, Colombia
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[5] Univ Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
来源：
EPILEPSIA | 2013年 / 54卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：212 / 212
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT FOCAL EPILEPSY: 3T VS. 1.5T
    Ladino, L. D.
    Balaguera, P.
    Tellez-Zenteno, J. F.
    Hernandez-Ronquillo, L.
    Delgado, J. A.
    EPILEPSIA, 2015, 56 : 156 - 156
  • [2] 7T versus 3T MRI in the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy
    Bubrick, Ellen J.
    Gholipour, Taha
    Hibert, Matthew
    Cosgrove, G. Rees
    Stufflebeam, Steven M.
    Young, Geoffrey S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2022, 32 (02) : 292 - 299
  • [3] Brain magnetic resonance imaging lesion volume correlates with physical disability and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: comparison of 1.5T and 3T
    Glanz, Bonnie I.
    Stankiewicz, James M.
    Healy, Brain
    Benedict, Ralph
    Arora, Ashish
    Neema, Mohit
    Guss, Zachary D.
    Buckle, Guy J.
    Houtchens, Maria
    Khoury, Samia
    Weiner, Howard L.
    Guttmann, Charles R.
    Bakshi, Rohit
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2008, 14 : S257 - S257
  • [4] Clinical 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain metastases at 1.5T and 3T
    Sjobakk, TE
    Lundgren, S
    Kristoffersen, A
    Singstad, T
    Svarliaunet, AJ
    Sonnewald, U
    Gribbestad, IS
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (05) : 501 - 508
  • [5] Comparison of Diffusion Metrics Obtained at 1.5T and 3T in Human Brain With Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging
    Shaw, Calvin B.
    Jensen, Jens H.
    Deardorff, Rachael L.
    Spampinato, Maria Vittoria
    Helpern, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (03) : 673 - 680
  • [6] Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
    A. Chopra
    A. J. Grainger
    B. Dube
    R. Evans
    R. Hodgson
    J. Conroy
    D. Macdonald
    Philip Robinson
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 963 - 971
  • [7] Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
    Chopra, A.
    Grainger, A. J.
    Dube, B.
    Evans, R.
    Hodgson, R.
    Conroy, J.
    Macdonald, D.
    Robinson, Philip
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 963 - 971
  • [8] Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot
    Bolen, Geraldine
    Audigie, Fabrice
    Spriet, Mathieu
    Vandenberghe, Filip
    Busoni, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2010, 30 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [9] Brain PET Imaging in the Presurgical Evaluation of Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy
    Flaus, Anthime
    Guedj, Eric
    Horowitz, Tatiana
    Semah, Franck
    Verger, Antoine
    Hammers, Alexander
    PET CLINICS, 2025, 20 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [10] Specific absorption rate in neonates undergoing magnetic resonance procedures at 1.5T and 3T
    Malik, Shaihan J.
    Beqiri, Arian
    Price, Anthony N.
    Teixeira, Jose Nuno
    Hand, Jeffrey W.
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 28 (03) : 344 - 352
12345