COMPARISON OF 3T AND 1.5T BRAIN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT FOCAL EPILEPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Ladino, L. D. [1 ]
Balaguera, P. [2 ]
Delgado, J. A. [3 ]
Tellez-Zenteno, J. F. [4 ]
Hernandez-Ronquillo, L. [4 ]
Llano, J. F. [3 ]
Rascovsky, S. J. [3 ]
Gomez-Arias, B. [5 ]
Arias, J. F. [5 ]
Bustamante, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, IATM, Epilepsy Res, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Medellin Clin, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Epilepsy Res, IATM, Medellin, Colombia
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[5] Univ Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 212
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Traumatic Meniscus and Cruciate Ligament Tears in Young Patients: A Comparison of 3T Versus 1.5T MRI
    Nouri, Nasreddine
    Bouaziz, Mouna Chelli
    Riahi, Hend
    Mechri, Meriem
    Kherfani, Abdelhakim
    Ouertatani, Moez
    Ladeb, Mohamed Fethi
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 101 (01):
  • [42] MR Diagnosis of Bone Metastases at 1.5T and 3T: Can STIR Imaging Be Omitted?
    Ohlmann-Knafo, S.
    Tarnoki, A. D.
    Tarnoki, D. L.
    Pickuth, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 924 - 932
  • [43] 1.5T versus 3T MRI for targeting subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation
    Cheng, Cheng-Hsin
    Huang, Hsing-Ming
    Lin, Hung-Lin
    Chiou, Shang-Ming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 467 - 470
  • [44] Relative SNR benefits of dynamic arterial spin labeling at 3T as determined by simulation and comparison with imaging at 1.5T
    Maleki, N.
    Stainsby, J.
    Roberts, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2010 - 2010
  • [45] 3D imaging of the whole spine at 3T compared to 1.5T: Initial experiences
    Rodegerdts, EA
    Boss, A
    Riemarzik, K
    Lichy, M
    Schick, F
    Claussen, CD
    Schlemmer, HP
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (05) : 488 - 493
  • [46] Adenosine stress perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenosis at 3T is not inferior to 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to invasive coronary x-ray angiography
    Bernhardt, P.
    Spiess, J.
    Gradinger, R.
    Hombach, V.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 209 - 210
  • [47] Retrospective comparison of routine brain MRI scans in patients at 0.55 T and 1.5/3T
    Lavrova, Anna
    Mishra, Shruti
    Kim, John
    Lobo, Remy
    Masotti, Maria
    Richardson, Jacob
    Itriago-Leon, Pedro
    Gulani, Vikas
    Wright, Katherine
    Kelsey, Lauren
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    Seiberlich, Nicole
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 184
  • [48] Myocardial T2*Imaging at 3T and 1.5T: A Pilot Study with Phantom and Normal Myocardium
    Chang, Suyon
    Park, Jinho
    Yang, Young-Joong
    Beck, Kyongmin Sarah
    Kim, Pan Ki
    Choi, Byoung Wook
    Jung, Jung Im
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (08)
  • [49] Variance components associated with long-echo-time MR spectroscopic imaging in human brain at 1.5T and 3T
    Thrippleton, Michael J.
    Parikh, Jehill P.
    Semple, Scott I. K.
    Harris, Bridget A.
    Andrews, Peter J. D.
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    Marshall, Ian
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [50] Difference in Number of Brain Metastases Detected using 1.5T and 3T MRI in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Jensen, L. G.
    Nath, S. K.
    Murphy, K. T.
    Alksne, J. F.
    Mundt, A. J.
    Lawson, J. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S300 - S300