Closed-loop identification revisited

被引:477
|
作者
Forssell, U [1 ]
Ljung, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Div Automat Control, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
system identification; closed-loop identification; prediction error methods; modelling; statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00022-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Identification of systems operating in closed loop has long been of prime interest in industrial applications. The problem offers many possibilities, and also some fallacies, and a wide variety of approaches have been suggested, many quite recently. The purpose of the current contribution is to place most of these approaches in a coherent framework, thereby showing their connections and display similarities and differences in the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimates. The common framework is created by the basic prediction error method, and it is shown that most of the common methods correspond to different parameterizations of the dynamics and noise models. The so-called indirect methods, e.g., are indeed "direct" methods employing noise models that contain the regulator. The asymptotic properties of the estimates then follow from the general theory and take different forms as they are translated to the particular parameterizations. We also study a new projection approach to closed-loop identification with the advantage of allowing approximation of the open-loop dynamics in a given, and user-chosen frequency domain norm, even in the case of an unknown, nonlinear regulator. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1241
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal input design for identification in closed-loop
    Bányász, CS
    Keviczky, L
    ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL AND MANUFACTURING: TRENDS, PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 14 : 155 - 162
  • [32] ALGORITHM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSED-LOOP PROCESSES.
    Madjarov, N.E.
    Maleshkov, S.B.
    Ganev, P.G.
    Sulemezova, N.S.
    Systems Science, 1983, 9 (04): : 5 - 18
  • [33] MPC closed-loop identification without excitation
    Zhu, Yun
    Yan, Wengang
    Zhu, Yucai
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 895 - 900
  • [34] Variance results for closed-loop identification methods
    Ljung, L
    Forssell, U
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 1997, : 2435 - 2440
  • [35] Case studies on closed-loop identification for MPC
    Zhu, YC
    Butoyi, F
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2002, 10 (04) : 403 - 417
  • [36] Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification
    Gevers, M
    Ljung, L
    Van den Hof, P
    AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (05) : 781 - 786
  • [37] MIMO closed-loop identification of an MSW incinerator
    Leskens, M
    Van Kessel, LBM
    Van den Hof, PMJ
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2002, 10 (03) : 315 - 326
  • [38] Closed-loop identification of a continuous crystallization process
    Eek, RA
    Both, JA
    VandenHof, PMJ
    AICHE JOURNAL, 1996, 42 (03) : 767 - 776
  • [39] Recursive subspace identification for closed-loop systems
    Jiang Yueping
    Fang Haitao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 3, 2007, : 287 - +
  • [40] The practical analysis for closed-loop system identification
    Jianhong, Wang
    Ramirez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2020, 7 (01):