Closed-loop identification revisited

被引:477
|
作者
Forssell, U [1 ]
Ljung, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Div Automat Control, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
system identification; closed-loop identification; prediction error methods; modelling; statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00022-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Identification of systems operating in closed loop has long been of prime interest in industrial applications. The problem offers many possibilities, and also some fallacies, and a wide variety of approaches have been suggested, many quite recently. The purpose of the current contribution is to place most of these approaches in a coherent framework, thereby showing their connections and display similarities and differences in the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimates. The common framework is created by the basic prediction error method, and it is shown that most of the common methods correspond to different parameterizations of the dynamics and noise models. The so-called indirect methods, e.g., are indeed "direct" methods employing noise models that contain the regulator. The asymptotic properties of the estimates then follow from the general theory and take different forms as they are translated to the particular parameterizations. We also study a new projection approach to closed-loop identification with the advantage of allowing approximation of the open-loop dynamics in a given, and user-chosen frequency domain norm, even in the case of an unknown, nonlinear regulator. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1241
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the Closed-Loop System Identification with Fractional Models
    Z. Yakoub
    M. Amairi
    M. Chetoui
    M. Aoun
    Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 2015, 34 : 3833 - 3860
  • [23] Closed-loop identification of a micro-sensor
    Chen, YC
    Hui, J
    M'Closkey, R
    42ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2632 - 2637
  • [24] IDENTIFICATION OF STABILIZABLE SYSTEMS - CLOSED-LOOP APPROXIMATION
    MAKILA, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1991, 54 (03) : 577 - 592
  • [25] Closed-loop identification of a laboratory chemical reactor
    Kozka, S
    Mikles, J
    Fikar, M
    Jelenciak, F
    Dzivak, J
    ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN 2000, VOLS 1 & 2, 2000, 1-2 : 663 - 668
  • [26] An efficient method for direct closed-loop identification
    Zheng, WX
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2001, : 4344 - 4345
  • [27] Closed-loop Subspace Identification Based on KPLS
    Lin Wen-yi
    Gu Yong
    Xie Lei
    2013 32ND CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2013, : 1843 - 1848
  • [28] PLANT IDENTIFICATION IN A STOCHASTIC CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM
    VORCHIK, VG
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1975, 36 (04) : 550 - 565
  • [29] Closed-loop System Identification with New Sensors
    Bendtsen, Jan
    Trangbaek, Klaus
    Stoustrup, Jakob
    47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, : 2631 - 2636
  • [30] Closed-loop identification with application to a chemical reactor
    Mikles, J
    Cirka, L
    Kozka, S
    DYNAMICS & CONTROL OF PROCESS SYSTEMS 1998, VOLUMES 1 AND 2, 1999, : 235 - 240