Closed-loop identification revisited

被引:477
|
作者
Forssell, U [1 ]
Ljung, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Div Automat Control, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
system identification; closed-loop identification; prediction error methods; modelling; statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00022-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Identification of systems operating in closed loop has long been of prime interest in industrial applications. The problem offers many possibilities, and also some fallacies, and a wide variety of approaches have been suggested, many quite recently. The purpose of the current contribution is to place most of these approaches in a coherent framework, thereby showing their connections and display similarities and differences in the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimates. The common framework is created by the basic prediction error method, and it is shown that most of the common methods correspond to different parameterizations of the dynamics and noise models. The so-called indirect methods, e.g., are indeed "direct" methods employing noise models that contain the regulator. The asymptotic properties of the estimates then follow from the general theory and take different forms as they are translated to the particular parameterizations. We also study a new projection approach to closed-loop identification with the advantage of allowing approximation of the open-loop dynamics in a given, and user-chosen frequency domain norm, even in the case of an unknown, nonlinear regulator. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1241
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Closed-loop subspace identification
    University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
    不详
    Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci., 2008, (55-78):
  • [2] Closed-loop identification with a quantizer
    Wang, M
    Thornhill, NF
    Huang, B
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2005, 15 (06) : 729 - 740
  • [3] ADAPTIVE IDENTIFICATION IN CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS
    AKSENOV, VM
    PASHCHENKO, FF
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1980, 41 (10) : 1388 - 1396
  • [4] IDENTIFICATION OF A CLOSED-LOOP STOCHASTIC SYSTEM
    VORCHIK, BG
    FETISOV, VN
    SHTEINBERG, SE
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1973, 34 (07) : 1069 - 1081
  • [5] Closed-loop identification of a chemical reactor
    Mikles, J
    Cirka, L
    Fikar, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SIMULATION AND MODELLING, 2004, : 201 - 206
  • [6] REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR CLOSED-LOOP IDENTIFICATION
    WELLSTEAD, PE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1977, 26 (06) : 945 - 962
  • [7] A projection method for closed-loop identification
    Forssell, U
    Ljung, L
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2000, 45 (11) : 2101 - 2106
  • [8] Grey Box Identification in Closed-loop
    Niemann, Henrik
    Miklos, Robert
    Poulsen, Niels Kjolstad
    2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 4990 - 4995
  • [9] Time complexity of closed-loop identification
    Wang, LY
    Yin, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2001, : 2007 - 2012
  • [10] Understanding closed-loop identification with ITCLI
    Rivera, D. E.
    Guzman, J. L.
    Berenguel, M.
    Dormido, S.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (28): : 739 - 744