Preoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Acimovic, M. [1 ]
Dabic-Stankovic, K. [1 ]
Pejcic, T. [1 ]
Dzamic, Z. [1 ]
Rafailovic, D. [1 ]
Hadzi-Djokic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med, Clin Ctr Serbia, Urol Clin, Belgrade, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2013年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
biochemical recurrence; prediction; prostate cancer; PSA; radical prostatectomy; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; ANTIGEN RECURRENCE; CANCER; CORES; SURVIVAL; SPECIMEN; NOMOGRAM; RISK; SUM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the factors that can improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for the patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: Our study included 182 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who were biopsied and underwent radical surgical treatment at the Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Medical Faculty in Belgrade from 1994 to 2004. Patients were prospectively followed-up and monitored for a minimum of 8 years and data were statistically processed by multivariate regression analysis. We arranged the predictors into 3 regressive models. In the first model the predictors were clinical stage of the disease, preoperative Gleason score, FIT PSA ratio and PSA. In the second model these predictors were accompanied with the number of positive biopsies and percent of positive prostate biopsies. In the third model, patient follow-up was added to the predictors. In all 3 models biochemical recurrence was considered as a dependent variable. Results: On multivariate analysis, patient follow-up (p <0.0001), percent of positive prostate biopsies (p <0.0001), bioptic Gleason score (p<0.0001) and preoperative PSA (p <0.003) were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The most successful prediction of recurrence that provided accurate prognosis for 80% of the patients was obtained by the third model using the percent of positive prostate biopsies, PSA and patient follow-up. Conclusion: As stated in multivariate analysis, the independent predictors according to the significance are the follows: patient follow-up, percent of positive prostate biopsies, bioptic Gleason score and preoperative PSA, whereas preoperative FIT PSA ratio is dependent predictor. The number of positive biopsies and clinical stage of the disease are of no significance.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 960
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of PSA percent tumor dimensional markers to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Mizuno, R.
    Nakashima, J.
    Shinoda, K.
    Kono, H.
    Kikuchi, E.
    Nagata, H.
    Asanuma, H.
    Miyajima, A.
    Nakagawa, K.
    Oya, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [42] Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer
    Merrill, Megan M.
    Lane, Brian R.
    Reuther, Alwyn M.
    Zhou, Ming
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Klein, Eric A.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (02) : 294 - 298
  • [43] GLOBAL GLEASON SCORE ON PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES IS THE BEST PREDICTOR OF PROSTATECTOMY GLEASON SCORE
    Shevchuk, Maria
    Mudaliar, Kumaran
    El Douaihy, Youssef
    Peters, David
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Grover, Sonal
    John, Majnu
    Leung, Robert
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E791 - E791
  • [44] Is There a Bioenergetic Signature of Prostate Cancer According to Gleason Grading and Time of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy?
    Billis, Athanase
    Favaro, Wagner
    da Silva, Rogerio C.
    Foratto, Alexandre
    Freitas, Leandro
    Costa, Larissa B.
    Barreto, Icleia S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 329 - 329
  • [45] Is There a Bioenergetic Signature of Prostate Cancer According to Gleason Grading and Time of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy?
    Billis, Athanase
    Favaro, Wagner
    da Silva, Rogerio C.
    Foratto, Alexandre
    Freitas, Leandro
    Costa, Larissa B.
    Barreto, Icleia S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 329 - 329
  • [46] Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Grybas, Aivaras
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
    Kincius, Marius
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 205 - 208
  • [47] Impact of multiple prostate biopsies: risk of perioperative complications and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Chung, Jae Wook
    Kim, Bum Soo
    Kang, Joon Gu
    Lee, You Jin
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Lee, Jun Nyung
    Choi, Seock Hwan
    Kim, Hyun Tae
    Yoo, Eun Sang
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Chung, Sung Kwang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 338 - 338
  • [48] Postoperative nomogram predicting the probability of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Allue, M.
    Borque, A.
    Esteban, L. M.
    Sanz, G.
    Del Amo, J.
    Ponz, R.
    Morote, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E977 - U49
  • [49] Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Jeffers, Abra
    Sochat, Vanessa
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Yu, Changhong
    Melcon, Erin
    Yamoah, Kosi
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (03): : 291 - 298
  • [50] Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review
    John, Athul
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Catterwell, Rick
    Selth, Luke A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):