Preoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Acimovic, M. [1 ]
Dabic-Stankovic, K. [1 ]
Pejcic, T. [1 ]
Dzamic, Z. [1 ]
Rafailovic, D. [1 ]
Hadzi-Djokic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med, Clin Ctr Serbia, Urol Clin, Belgrade, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2013年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
biochemical recurrence; prediction; prostate cancer; PSA; radical prostatectomy; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; ANTIGEN RECURRENCE; CANCER; CORES; SURVIVAL; SPECIMEN; NOMOGRAM; RISK; SUM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the factors that can improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for the patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: Our study included 182 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who were biopsied and underwent radical surgical treatment at the Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Medical Faculty in Belgrade from 1994 to 2004. Patients were prospectively followed-up and monitored for a minimum of 8 years and data were statistically processed by multivariate regression analysis. We arranged the predictors into 3 regressive models. In the first model the predictors were clinical stage of the disease, preoperative Gleason score, FIT PSA ratio and PSA. In the second model these predictors were accompanied with the number of positive biopsies and percent of positive prostate biopsies. In the third model, patient follow-up was added to the predictors. In all 3 models biochemical recurrence was considered as a dependent variable. Results: On multivariate analysis, patient follow-up (p <0.0001), percent of positive prostate biopsies (p <0.0001), bioptic Gleason score (p<0.0001) and preoperative PSA (p <0.003) were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The most successful prediction of recurrence that provided accurate prognosis for 80% of the patients was obtained by the third model using the percent of positive prostate biopsies, PSA and patient follow-up. Conclusion: As stated in multivariate analysis, the independent predictors according to the significance are the follows: patient follow-up, percent of positive prostate biopsies, bioptic Gleason score and preoperative PSA, whereas preoperative FIT PSA ratio is dependent predictor. The number of positive biopsies and clinical stage of the disease are of no significance.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 960
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HP1γ expression is elevated in prostate cancer and is superior to Gleason score as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Jon Slezak
    Matthew Truong
    Wei Huang
    David Jarrard
    BMC Cancer, 13
  • [32] Association of Genomic Prostate Score at positive margin with recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Abadchi, Sanaz Nourmohammadi
    Salles, Daniela C.
    Flannery, Cynthia
    Sama, Varun
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Zambon, Joao P.
    Mendes, Adrianna A.
    Oliveira, Lia DePaula
    Han, Misop
    Jing, Yuezhou
    Partin, Alan W.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (06) : 939 - 944
  • [33] THE IMPACT OF DOWNGRADING FROM BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY GLEASON SCORE 6 ON BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE
    Ham, Won Sik
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Han, Misop
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E713 - E713
  • [34] Gleason Score as Predictor of Clinicopathologic Findings and Biochemical (PSA) Progression Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Guimaraes, Marbele S.
    Quintal, Maisa M.
    Meirelles, Luciana R.
    Magna, Luis A.
    Ferreira, Ubirajara
    Billis, Athanase
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2008, 34 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [35] Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012
    Danneman, Daniela
    Drevin, Linda
    Delahunt, Brett
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Robinson, David
    Bratt, Ola
    Loeb, Stacy
    Stattin, Par
    Egevad, Lars
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [37] The Proportion of Free PSA and Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
    Visapaa, Harri
    Hotakainen, Kristina
    Lundin, Johan
    Ala-Opas, Martti
    Stenman, Ulf-Hokan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (04) : 378 - 381
  • [38] DECREASE IN ULTRASENSITIVE PSA AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AS THE PROGNOSTIC FACTOR OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Vesely, S.
    Jarolim, L.
    Kawaciuk, I.
    Hanek, P.
    Schmidt, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 294 - 294
  • [40] Clinical and pathological outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with a preoperative Gleason score 8 to 10
    Bastian, PJ
    Gonzalgo, ML
    Freedland, SJ
    Mangold, LA
    Partin, TW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 452 - 452