Modelling of input data uncertainty for the financial evaluation of complex infrastructure projects

被引:0
|
作者
Beisler, M. [1 ]
Klapperich, H. [2 ]
Jacob, D. [3 ]
Schweiger, H. [4 ]
机构
[1] ILF Beratende Ingenieure ZT Gesell mbH, A-6063 Rum Innsbruck, Austria
[2] TU Bergakad Freiberg, Inst Geotech, Lehrstuhl Bodenmech Bergbauliche Geotech & Grundb, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany
[3] TU Bergakad Freiberg, Lehrstuhl ABWL, Fak Wirtschaftswissensch, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany
[4] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Bodenmech & Grundbau, A-8010 Graz, Austria
来源
BAUINGENIEUR | 2013年 / 88卷
关键词
RANDOM SET-THEORY; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The planning of complex infrastructure projects represents an interdisciplinary process, which is characterised and heavily influenced by uncertain information and imprecise input parameters. During early planning stages the majority of technical as well as economic parameters, which are of crucial importance for the detailed design and project implementation, cannot be determined with precision. It is therefore common practice that these figures are selected as deterministic values, which require extensive optimisation throughout subsequent planning stages. A major disadvantage inherent to commonly used deterministic analysis is the lack of objectivity for the selection of input parameters. Moreover, it cannot be ensured that the entire existing parameter range and all possible parameter combinations are covered. Probabilistic methods utilise discrete probability distributions or parameter input ranges to cover the entire range of uncertainties resulting from an information deficit during the planning phase and integrate them into the optimisation process by means of alternative calculation methods. In the field of geotechnical engineering this approach has been employed successfully to objectively account for uncertainties related to geological conditions and material properties in the context of design analysis. The article examines to what extent the random set theory (RST) is suitable as a reliable, scientific methodology that can be utilised for handling of vague information and imprecise input parameters in the context of economic project appraisal. The primary applications of RST in this context are the identification, analysis and management of project risks. The method can also be utilised to stipulate and evaluate the decision criteria, which are used to support the process of investment decision making. Furthermore the RST can represent a suitable instrument for the re-evaluation of a project's feasibility under changed technical and economic boundary conditions. This is of particular interest for energy projects such as hydro-power generation, under consideration of the steadily increasing energy prices and a significantly growing demand for renewable energy (compare Pottler [13]).
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 88
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH PROJECTS
    NORTH, AG
    JOURNAL OF THE OIL & COLOUR CHEMISTS ASSOCIATION, 1971, 54 (12): : 1128 - &
  • [22] The challenge of data in analysis for infrastructure projects
    Lennon, Andrew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2020, 173 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [23] A REVIEW OF MATERIALS DATA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
    Henry, Scott D.
    Berardinis, Lawrence A.
    Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME), 2015, : 277 - 284
  • [24] The evaluation of road infrastructure development projects
    Van Damme, Olivier
    Van Geelen, Hinko
    Courange, Patricia
    TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 467 - 473
  • [25] Managing uncertainty for sustainability of complex projects
    Brink, Tove
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2017, 10 (02) : 315 - 329
  • [26] Modelling concurrent engineering projects under uncertainty
    Kara, S
    Kayis, B
    Kaebernick, H
    CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 7 (03): : 269 - 274
  • [27] Sorption of iron on surfaces:: Modelling data evaluation, and measurement uncertainty
    Meinrath, G
    Merkel, B
    Ödegaard-Jensen, A
    Ekberg, C
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2004, 32 (02): : 154 - 160
  • [28] A research review on Building Information Modelling in Infrastructure projects
    Dongmo-Engeland, B.
    Merschbrock, C.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 601 - 607
  • [29] Adopting Qualitative Data in Conceptual System Dynamic Modelling: A Focus on Road Infrastructure Projects in Nigeria
    Mahmud, Abba Tahir
    Ogunlana, Stephen O.
    Hong, W. T.
    Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya
    Akoh, Sani Rueben
    CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING, 2023, 23 (3-4): : 71 - 86
  • [30] The financial additionality and viability of CDM projects allowing for uncertainty
    Carmichael, David G.
    Lea, Kjell A.
    Balatbat, Maria C. A.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 18 (01) : 129 - 141