Benchmarking the environmental performance of best management practice and genetic improvements in Egyptian aquaculture using life cycle assessment

被引:35
|
作者
Henriksson, Patrik J. G. [1 ,2 ]
Dickson, Malcolm [3 ]
Allah, Ahmed Nasr [3 ]
Al-Kenawy, Diaa [3 ]
Phillips, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] WorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Bayan Lepas 11960, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-11419 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] WorldFish, 18 B Marashly St,4th Floor,Apt 17, Cairo 11211, Egypt
关键词
LCA; Tilapia; Egypt; BMP; Environment; Footprint; VALUE-CHAIN ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; FISHERIES; FOOTPRINT; PRODUCTS; SECTOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.09.051
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Egyptian aquaculture is gaining importance as an affordable and nutritious source of animal protein among Egyptians. Nile tilapia dominates production (77% of total production), followed by carps (17%) and mullets (11%). Egyptian tilapia farmers are, however, facing challenges with regards to financial viability and poor water quality. Fish farms are also contributing towards water pollution and other environmental impacts. In order to improve the situation, WorldFish launched the IEIDEAS project in 2011 with the ambition to train farmers in best management practices (BMP) and distribute the 9th generation of the Abbassa strain (G9). The present study aimed at evaluating any relative environmental gains that BMP and G9 offers compared to conventional farming using life cycle assessment (LCA). Inventory data representing 137 farmers and four groups (control, BMP, G9 and BMP + G9) were evaluated. Life cycle impact assessment results including quantitative uncertainties were then calculated and statistically tested, using Monte Carlo analysis and Wilcoxon paired significance test. Five impact categories were explored: global warming, eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. The G9 stain offered the greatest improvements across the evaluated impact categories, significantly reducing environmental impacts with between 12% and 36%. BMP, in the meantime, only offered significant improvements compared to the control with regards to eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. Meanwhile, BMP + G9 performed comparably to only G9 except for eutrophication where it had a significantly larger environmental footprint. More efficient feed utilization and higher productivity were the main reasons for the environmental improvements. Additional improvements that should be explored include improved feeds made of sustainably sourced raw materials, and better pond water management, including probiotics and paddle-wheels. Statement of relevance: BMP and improved stains help reduce environmental impacts (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainable Environmental Management using Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Model in Petrochemical Industry
    Maleki, R.
    Atabi, F.
    Jozi, S. A.
    Arjomandi, R.
    Mansouri, N.
    POLLUTION, 2020, 6 (02): : 337 - 351
  • [42] Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    Goedkoop, Mark
    Guinee, Jeroen
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Huijbregts, Mark
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Margni, Manuele
    De Schryver, An
    Humbert, Sebastien
    Laurent, Alexis
    Sala, Serenella
    Pant, Rana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (03): : 683 - 697
  • [43] Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment
    Michael Z. Hauschild
    Mark Goedkoop
    Jeroen Guinée
    Reinout Heijungs
    Mark Huijbregts
    Olivier Jolliet
    Manuele Margni
    An De Schryver
    Sebastien Humbert
    Alexis Laurent
    Serenella Sala
    Rana Pant
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 683 - 697
  • [44] Environmental performance evolution of municipal solid waste management by life cycle assessment in Hangzhou, China
    Zhou, Zhaozhi
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Ni, Mingjiang
    Li, Nan
    Zhang, Yongfang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 227 : 23 - 33
  • [45] The environmental performance of four municipal solid waste management scenarios: A life cycle assessment study
    Jaafarzadeh, Neemat
    Ahmadmoazzam, Mehdi
    Kojloo, Rahele
    Jorfi, Sahand
    Baasim, Yalda
    ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 31 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [46] Optimizing the Environmental Performance of In Situ Thermal Remediation Technologies Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Lemming, Gitte
    Nielsen, Steffen G.
    Weber, Klaus
    Heron, Gorm
    Baker, Ralph S.
    Falkenberg, Jacqueline A.
    Terkelsen, Mads
    Jensen, Carsten B.
    Bjerg, Poul L.
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2013, 33 (03): : 38 - 51
  • [47] A comparison of environmental performance of electronic and bound-thesis using life cycle assessment
    Yogeswaran, Suwarkka
    Kumareswaran, Keerthana
    Atapattu, N. S. B. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 437
  • [48] Measuring environmental performance in the early phases of product design using life cycle assessment
    Maruschke, Julian
    Rosemann, Bernd
    Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Proceedings, 2005, : 248 - 249
  • [49] Environmental performance analysis of residential buildings in Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Evangelista, Patricia P. A.
    Kiperstok, Asher
    Torres, Ednildo A.
    Goncalves, Jardel P.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 169 : 748 - 761
  • [50] Environmental footprint performance improvement of black tea using the life cycle assessment approach
    Zhang, Congguang
    Ye, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Hui
    Xie, Juan
    Yang, Xiong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 430