Benchmarking the environmental performance of best management practice and genetic improvements in Egyptian aquaculture using life cycle assessment

被引:35
|
作者
Henriksson, Patrik J. G. [1 ,2 ]
Dickson, Malcolm [3 ]
Allah, Ahmed Nasr [3 ]
Al-Kenawy, Diaa [3 ]
Phillips, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] WorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Bayan Lepas 11960, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-11419 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] WorldFish, 18 B Marashly St,4th Floor,Apt 17, Cairo 11211, Egypt
关键词
LCA; Tilapia; Egypt; BMP; Environment; Footprint; VALUE-CHAIN ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; FISHERIES; FOOTPRINT; PRODUCTS; SECTOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.09.051
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Egyptian aquaculture is gaining importance as an affordable and nutritious source of animal protein among Egyptians. Nile tilapia dominates production (77% of total production), followed by carps (17%) and mullets (11%). Egyptian tilapia farmers are, however, facing challenges with regards to financial viability and poor water quality. Fish farms are also contributing towards water pollution and other environmental impacts. In order to improve the situation, WorldFish launched the IEIDEAS project in 2011 with the ambition to train farmers in best management practices (BMP) and distribute the 9th generation of the Abbassa strain (G9). The present study aimed at evaluating any relative environmental gains that BMP and G9 offers compared to conventional farming using life cycle assessment (LCA). Inventory data representing 137 farmers and four groups (control, BMP, G9 and BMP + G9) were evaluated. Life cycle impact assessment results including quantitative uncertainties were then calculated and statistically tested, using Monte Carlo analysis and Wilcoxon paired significance test. Five impact categories were explored: global warming, eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. The G9 stain offered the greatest improvements across the evaluated impact categories, significantly reducing environmental impacts with between 12% and 36%. BMP, in the meantime, only offered significant improvements compared to the control with regards to eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. Meanwhile, BMP + G9 performed comparably to only G9 except for eutrophication where it had a significantly larger environmental footprint. More efficient feed utilization and higher productivity were the main reasons for the environmental improvements. Additional improvements that should be explored include improved feeds made of sustainably sourced raw materials, and better pond water management, including probiotics and paddle-wheels. Statement of relevance: BMP and improved stains help reduce environmental impacts (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the environmental performance of bio-waste management with life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Simone Manfredi
    Rana Pant
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 285 - 291
  • [32] Effective environmental management through life cycle assessment
    Khan, FI
    Raveender, V
    Husain, T
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2002, 15 (06) : 455 - 466
  • [33] Evaluation of the environmental performance of printing and writing paper using life cycle assessment
    Dias, AC
    Louro, M
    Arroja, L
    Capela, I
    Proceedings of ICECFOP1: 1st International Conference on Environmentally-Compatible Forest Products, 2004, : 57 - 69
  • [34] Assessing the environmental performance of a university campus using a life cycle assessment approach
    Dogruparmak, Senay cetin
    Cankaya, Simge
    Kibar, Murat Efgan
    Pekey, Beyhan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, : 645 - 664
  • [35] The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study
    Arena, U
    Mastellone, ML
    Perugini, F
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 96 (1-3) : 207 - 222
  • [36] Application of a life cycle assessment to compare environmental performance in coal mine tailings management
    Adiansyah, Joni Safaat
    Haque, Nawshad
    Rosano, Michele
    Biswas, Wahidul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 199 : 181 - 191
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of interior partition walls: Comparison between functionality requirements and best environmental performance
    Elena Valencia-Barba, Yovanna
    Manuel Gomez-Soberon, Jose
    Consolacion Gomez-Soberon, Maria
    Neftali Rojas-Valencia, Maria
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44 (44):
  • [38] The Extended of the Life Cycle Assessment on Corporate Environmental Performance
    Chen, Xuan
    Chun, Weide
    CONFERENCE ON WEB BASED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 104 - +
  • [39] Benchmarking and environmental performance classes in life cycle assessment—development of a procedure for non-leather shoes in the context of the Product Environmental Footprint
    Sarah Gül
    Michael Spielmann
    Annekatrin Lehmann
    Diana Eggers
    Vanessa Bach
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 1640 - 1648
  • [40] Sustainable Solid Waste Management Using Life Cycle Modeling for Environmental Impact Assessment
    Horttanainen, Mika
    Liikanen, Miia
    Havukainen, Jouni
    Deviatkin, Ivan
    INFORMATION MODELLING AND KNOWLEDGE BASES XXXI, 2020, 321 : 16 - 33