Benchmarking the environmental performance of best management practice and genetic improvements in Egyptian aquaculture using life cycle assessment

被引:35
|
作者
Henriksson, Patrik J. G. [1 ,2 ]
Dickson, Malcolm [3 ]
Allah, Ahmed Nasr [3 ]
Al-Kenawy, Diaa [3 ]
Phillips, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] WorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Bayan Lepas 11960, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-11419 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] WorldFish, 18 B Marashly St,4th Floor,Apt 17, Cairo 11211, Egypt
关键词
LCA; Tilapia; Egypt; BMP; Environment; Footprint; VALUE-CHAIN ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; FISHERIES; FOOTPRINT; PRODUCTS; SECTOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.09.051
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Egyptian aquaculture is gaining importance as an affordable and nutritious source of animal protein among Egyptians. Nile tilapia dominates production (77% of total production), followed by carps (17%) and mullets (11%). Egyptian tilapia farmers are, however, facing challenges with regards to financial viability and poor water quality. Fish farms are also contributing towards water pollution and other environmental impacts. In order to improve the situation, WorldFish launched the IEIDEAS project in 2011 with the ambition to train farmers in best management practices (BMP) and distribute the 9th generation of the Abbassa strain (G9). The present study aimed at evaluating any relative environmental gains that BMP and G9 offers compared to conventional farming using life cycle assessment (LCA). Inventory data representing 137 farmers and four groups (control, BMP, G9 and BMP + G9) were evaluated. Life cycle impact assessment results including quantitative uncertainties were then calculated and statistically tested, using Monte Carlo analysis and Wilcoxon paired significance test. Five impact categories were explored: global warming, eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. The G9 stain offered the greatest improvements across the evaluated impact categories, significantly reducing environmental impacts with between 12% and 36%. BMP, in the meantime, only offered significant improvements compared to the control with regards to eutrophication, acidification, freshwater consumption and land use. Meanwhile, BMP + G9 performed comparably to only G9 except for eutrophication where it had a significantly larger environmental footprint. More efficient feed utilization and higher productivity were the main reasons for the environmental improvements. Additional improvements that should be explored include improved feeds made of sustainably sourced raw materials, and better pond water management, including probiotics and paddle-wheels. Statement of relevance: BMP and improved stains help reduce environmental impacts (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking for best practice environmental management
    Jenkins, BR
    Hine, PT
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 85 (02) : 115 - 134
  • [2] Benchmarking for Best Practice Environmental Management
    Bryan R. Jenkins
    Philip T. Hine
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2003, 85 : 115 - 134
  • [3] Environmental evaluation of aquaculture using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Fitwi, Biniam Samuel
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2013, 85 (01): : 76 - 77
  • [4] Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment
    Kuldip Singh Sangwan
    Kailash Choudhary
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 518 - 529
  • [5] Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    Choudhary, Kailash
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (03): : 518 - 529
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment of an alkyd emulsion: Improvements in environmental performance
    Ophus, E
    Digernes, V
    JOCCA-SURFACE COATINGS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 79 (04): : 156 - &
  • [7] Benchmarking the Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Buildings
    Gervasio, Helena
    Dimova, Silvia
    Pinto, Artur
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [8] Benchmarking the Environmental Performance of the Jatropha Biodiesel System through a Generic Life Cycle Assessment
    Almeida, J.
    Achten, W. M. J.
    Duarte, M. P.
    Mendes, B.
    Muys, B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (12) : 5447 - 5453
  • [9] Distribution of environmental performance in life cycle assessments—implications for environmental benchmarking
    Sebastian Welling
    Sven-Olof Ryding
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 275 - 289
  • [10] Distribution of environmental performance in life cycle assessments-implications for environmental benchmarking
    Welling, Sebastian
    Ryding, Sven-Olof
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (02): : 275 - 289