CFD simulation and validation of wind-driven rain on a building facade with an Eulerian multiphase model

被引:101
|
作者
Kubilay, A. [1 ,2 ]
Derome, D. [1 ,2 ]
Blocken, B. [3 ]
Carmeliet, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol ETHZ, Chair Bldg Phys, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] EMPA, Swiss Fed Labs Mat Testing & Res, Lab Bldg Technol, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Driving rain; Wind-driven rain; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Eulerian multiphase model; Numerical simulation; ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.12.005
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Wind-driven rain (WDR) is one of the most important moisture sources with potential negative effects on hygrothermal performance and durability of buildings. The impact of WDR on building facades can be understood in a better way by predicting the surface wetting distribution accurately. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation with the Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT) method has been widely used and validated by several researchers for different isolated building configurations. In this paper, Eulerian Multiphase modeling (EM) for WDR assessment is applied and validated for a monumental tower building (St. Hubertus building in The Netherlands). The LPT and EM models show comparable results and EM is validated by comparison of the calculated catch ratio values with available experimental data on windward facade. The deviations between the experimental and the model results at low rain intensity and wind speed are attributed to the absence of turbulent dispersion in both LPT and EM models. EM has the advantages, first, of less computational complexity and faster pre-processing and post-processing in terms of raindrop trajectories and WDR catch ratios, and second, of allowing the calculation of catch ratios on all surfaces of a complex geometry over the domain at once. The user time spent for the simulation decreases by at least a factor of 10 using EM instead of LPT for a single building. Additionally, the EM is expected to provide a sound basis for future WDR studies incorporating more accurate calculation of the wind flow field, e.g. by LES and the inclusion of turbulent dispersion. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 81
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical modeling of turbulent dispersion for wind-driven rain on building facades
    A. Kubilay
    D. Derome
    B. Blocken
    J. Carmeliet
    Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 15 : 109 - 133
  • [32] Observation Experiment of Wind-Driven Rain Harvesting from a Building Wall
    Yoo, Chulsang
    Cho, Eunsaem
    Lee, Munseok
    Kim, Soeun
    WATER, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [33] Large Eddy Simulations of Wind-Driven Rain on Tall Building Facades
    Huang, S. H.
    Li, Q. S.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (08) : 967 - 983
  • [34] Computational fluid dynamics simulations of wind-driven rain on a mid-rise residential building with various types of facade details
    Kubilay, A.
    Carmeliet, J.
    Derome, D.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION, 2017, 10 (02) : 125 - 143
  • [35] The influence of the wind-blocking effect by a building on its wind-driven rain exposure
    Blocken, B
    Carmeliet, J
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2006, 94 (02) : 101 - 127
  • [36] Modelling of turbulent dispersion for numerical simulation of wind-driven rain on bridges
    Man Liu
    Sheng Hong Huang
    Bo Wen Yan
    Qiu Sheng Li
    Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 18 : 1463 - 1489
  • [37] Simulation of wind-driven-rain around a building
    Choi, E.C.C.
    Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 46-47 : 721 - 729
  • [39] Modelling of turbulent dispersion for numerical simulation of wind-driven rain on bridges
    Liu, Man
    Huang, Sheng Hong
    Yan, Bo Wen
    Li, Qiu Sheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 18 (06) : 1463 - 1489
  • [40] Numerical Simulation of Wind-Driven Rain on a Long-Span Bridge
    Huang, Shenghong
    Li, Qiusheng
    Liu, Man
    Chen, Fubin
    Liu, Shun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2019, 19 (12)