Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Chang, Andrew K. [1 ]
Bijur, Polly E. [1 ]
Davitt, Michelle [1 ]
Gallagher, E. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTOR; MORPHINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ANALGESIA; ETHNICITY; MEDICINE; MG/KG;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-013-0103-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Opioid titration is an effective strategy for treating pain; however, titration is generally impractical in the busy emergency department (ED) setting. Our objective was to test a rapid, two-step, hydromorphone titration protocol against usual care in older patients presenting to the ED with acute severe pain. This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients 65 years of age and older presenting to an adult, urban, academic ED with acute severe pain. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01429285). Patients randomized to the hydromorphone titration protocol initially received 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients randomized to usual care received any dose of any intravenous opioid. At 15 min, patients in both groups were asked, 'Do you want more pain medication?' Patients in the hydromorphone titration group who answered 'yes' received a second dose of 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients in the usual care group who answered 'yes' had their ED attending physician notified, who then could administer any (or no) additional medication. The primary efficacy outcome was satisfactory analgesia defined a priori as the patient declining additional analgesia at least once when asked at 15 or 60 min after administration of the initial opioid. Dose was calculated in morphine equivalent units (MEU: 1 mg hydromorphone = 7 mg morphine). The need for naloxone to reverse adverse opioid effects was the primary safety outcome. 83.0 % of 153 patients in the hydromorphone titration group achieved satisfactory analgesia compared with 82.5 % of 166 patients in the usual care group (p = 0.91). Patients in the hydromorphone titration group received lower mean initial doses of opioids at baseline than patients in the usual care group (3.5 MEU vs. 4.7 MEU, respectively; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001) and lower total opioids through 60 min (5.3 MEU vs. 6.0 MEU; p = 0.03). No patient needed naloxone. Low-dose titration of intravenous hydromorphone in increments of 0.5 mg provides comparable analgesia to usual care with less opioid over 60 min.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 754
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE FOR THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TREATMENT OF ACUTE RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Tanen, David A.
    Shimada, Mai
    Danish, D. Chris
    Dos Santos, Frank
    Makela, Martin
    Riffenburgh, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (01): : 119 - 124
  • [32] Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: a randomised clinical trial
    Turkcuer, Ibrahim
    Serinken, Mustafa
    Eken, Cenker
    Yilmaz, Atakan
    Akdag, Omer
    Uyanik, Emrah
    Kiray, Cihan
    Elicabuk, Hayri
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (03) : 182 - 185
  • [33] Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute musculoskeletal trauma in the emergency department: A randomised clinical trial
    Yilmaz, Atakan
    Sabirli, Ramazan
    Ozen, Mert
    Turkcuer, Ibrahim
    Erdur, Bulent
    Arikan, Cuneyt
    Demirozogul, Ezgi
    Sarohan, Ahmet
    Seyit, Murat
    Ok, Nusret
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (05): : 902 - 908
  • [34] Management of acute bronchitis in Switzerland with Pelargonium sidoides extract EPS 7630 versus usual care: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Bourqui, Angelique
    Dubois, Julie
    Bonofiglio, Federico
    Csajka, Chantal
    Rodondi, Pierre-Yves
    PLANTA MEDICA, 2023, 89 (14) : 1345 - 1345
  • [35] Antibiotics Administered via Intravenous Push Versus Intravenous Piggyback to Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: a Randomized Trial
    Aryan Rahbar
    John Promlap
    Jayme Patel
    Jason David
    Lisa Phan
    Perry Lee
    Tony Zitek
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 5 (1)
  • [36] A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Pain Management During Intravenous Cannulation in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Miller, Kate
    Tan, Xianghong
    Hobson, Andrew Dillon
    Khan, Asaduzzaman
    Ziviani, Jenny
    O'Brien, Eavan
    Barua, Kim
    McBride, Craig A.
    Kimble, Roy M.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2016, 32 (07) : 444 - 451
  • [37] A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Intravenous Prochlorperazine Versus Subcutaneous Sumatriptan in Acute Migraine Therapy in the Emergency Department
    Kostic, Mark A.
    Gutierrez, Francisco J.
    Rieg, Thomas S.
    Moore, Tammy S.
    Gendron, Richard T.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [38] Design of an adaptive randomized clinical trial of intravenous citrulline for sickle cell pain crisis in the emergency department
    Majumdar, S.
    McKinley, K. W.
    Chamberlain, J.
    Thomas, B.
    Margulies, S.
    Nickel, R. S.
    Darbari, D. S.
    Campbell, A.
    Berul, C.
    Summar, M.
    Kalsi, G.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 32
  • [39] A Structured Protocol of Evidence-Based Conservative Care Compared With Usual Care for Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Parkin-Smith, Gregory F.
    Norman, Ian J.
    Briggs, Emma
    Angier, Elizabeth
    Wood, Timothy G.
    Brantingham, James W.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (01): : 11 - 20
  • [40] Intravenous Caffeine versus Intravenous Ketorolac for the Management of Moderate to Severe Migraine Headache in the Emergency Department; A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Baratloo, A.
    Friedman, B.
    Rouhipour, A.
    Mirbaha, S.
    HEADACHE, 2017, 57 (08): : 1313 - 1314