Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Chang, Andrew K. [1 ]
Bijur, Polly E. [1 ]
Davitt, Michelle [1 ]
Gallagher, E. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTOR; MORPHINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ANALGESIA; ETHNICITY; MEDICINE; MG/KG;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-013-0103-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Opioid titration is an effective strategy for treating pain; however, titration is generally impractical in the busy emergency department (ED) setting. Our objective was to test a rapid, two-step, hydromorphone titration protocol against usual care in older patients presenting to the ED with acute severe pain. This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients 65 years of age and older presenting to an adult, urban, academic ED with acute severe pain. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01429285). Patients randomized to the hydromorphone titration protocol initially received 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients randomized to usual care received any dose of any intravenous opioid. At 15 min, patients in both groups were asked, 'Do you want more pain medication?' Patients in the hydromorphone titration group who answered 'yes' received a second dose of 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients in the usual care group who answered 'yes' had their ED attending physician notified, who then could administer any (or no) additional medication. The primary efficacy outcome was satisfactory analgesia defined a priori as the patient declining additional analgesia at least once when asked at 15 or 60 min after administration of the initial opioid. Dose was calculated in morphine equivalent units (MEU: 1 mg hydromorphone = 7 mg morphine). The need for naloxone to reverse adverse opioid effects was the primary safety outcome. 83.0 % of 153 patients in the hydromorphone titration group achieved satisfactory analgesia compared with 82.5 % of 166 patients in the usual care group (p = 0.91). Patients in the hydromorphone titration group received lower mean initial doses of opioids at baseline than patients in the usual care group (3.5 MEU vs. 4.7 MEU, respectively; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001) and lower total opioids through 60 min (5.3 MEU vs. 6.0 MEU; p = 0.03). No patient needed naloxone. Low-dose titration of intravenous hydromorphone in increments of 0.5 mg provides comparable analgesia to usual care with less opioid over 60 min.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 754
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intravenous subdissociative-dose ketamine versus morphine for acute geriatric pain in the Emergency Department: A randomized controlled trial
    Motov, Sergey
    Mann, Stefan
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Butt, Mahlaqa
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Yetter, Elizabeth
    Brady, Jason
    Rothberger, Nechama
    Gohel, Ankit
    Flom, Peter
    Mai, Mo
    Fromm, Christian
    Marshall, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (02): : 220 - 227
  • [22] Intravenous lorazepam versus dimenhydrinate for treatment of vertigo in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial
    Marill, KA
    Walsh, MJ
    Nelson, BK
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 36 (04) : 310 - 319
  • [23] Acute Pain Management in Older Adults in the Emergency Department
    Hwang, Ula
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2013, 29 (01) : 151 - +
  • [24] Pain management of acute limb trauma patients with intravenous lidocaine in emergency department
    Farahmand, Shervin
    Hamrah, Hadid
    Arbab, Mona
    Sedaghat, Mojtaba
    Ghafouri, Hamed Basir
    Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (07): : 1231 - 1235
  • [25] Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate for Pain Management in Patients with Acute Renal Colic; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Majidi, Alireza
    Derakhshani, Fatemeh
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [26] COMMENT ON A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS HALOPERIDOL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR ACUTE MIGRAINE THERAPY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Fisher, Harold
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (03): : E75 - E75
  • [27] Controlled clinical trial of canine therapy versus usual care to reduce patient anxiety in the emergency department
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    Fisher, Michelle A.
    Pettit, Katherine L.
    Linville, Courtney T.
    Beck, Alan M.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [28] Comparing intravenous lidocaine and pethidine for pain management in emergency department patients with femoral bone fracture: a randomized controlled trial
    Eftekhar, Seyed Parsa
    Hazrati, Ebrahim
    Mosaed, Reza
    Dini, Saeed Shiralizadeh
    Galougahi, Mohammad Hassan Kazemi
    Namazi, Mehrshad
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [29] Pain management interventions with parents in the emergency department: a randomized trial
    LeMay, Sylvie
    Johnston, Celeste
    Choiniere, Manon
    Fortin, Christophe
    Hubert, Isabelle
    Frechette, Gabrielle
    Kudirka, Denise
    Murray, Louise
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (11) : 2442 - 2449
  • [30] Randomized Clinical Trial of an Emergency Department Observation Syncope Protocol Versus Routine Inpatient Admission
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    McCreath, Heather
    Liang, Li-Jung
    Bohan, Stephen
    Baugh, Christopher
    Ragsdale, Luna
    Henderson, Sean O.
    Clark, Carol
    Bastani, Aveh
    Keeler, Emmett
    An, Ruopeng
    Mangione, Carol M.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 64 (02) : 167 - 175